Durkheim, Religion, and the Postcolonial Critique of Sociology's Eurocentrism

被引:3
作者
Bermejo, Jose Juan Oses [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Fac Ciencias Sociales & Jurid, Calle Madrid 126, Getafe 28903, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Durkheim; Eurocentrism; identity; postcolonialism; religion; ritual; solidarity; KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1177/1468795X231186756
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In light of the postcolonial critique of Eurocentrism, the epistemological foundations of sociology and the legacies of classical sociologists have certainly become controversial. Postcolonial critiques of sociology's Eurocentrism have denounced the "parochial" nature and limitations of the theoretical contributions left by Marx, Weber, and Durkheim, the reductive and stereotyping orientation of the "primitivist" and/or "orientalist" representations of non-Western peoples that can be identified in their work, and the incomplete and misleading accounts of the Western processes of modernization that we have inherited from them, which fail to fully address and satisfactorily account for the realities of modern Western forms of colonialism and imperialism. However, the nature and consequences of Durkheim's specific sociological Eurocentrism raise opposing views within postcolonialism. This article aims to evaluate the pertinence of the divergent and sometimes contradictory postcolonial appraisals of Durkheim's Eurocentrism by focusing particularly on the controversies generated by his sociological approach to religion. Placing Durkheim's sociological project within both the academic field and the socio-political context in which it took shape, this article highlights the shifting relevance and the implications of his evolving sociological approach to this object of study in his science of morals. Although it is not exempt from inconsistencies and Eurocentric assumptions, Durkheim's sociological approach to religion leaves an invaluable legacy for a non-dualistic sociological understanding of the rituals through which humans (re)create their social identities and their forms of belonging and solidarity. In line with the priorities of some postcolonial agendas, it can fully reveal its explanatory potential in the sociological investigation of modern and contemporary interethnic and racial conflicts and forms of colonialism and neo-colonialism.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 223
页数:31
相关论文
共 102 条
[21]   Orientalism as Cultural Practices and the Production of Sociological Knowledge [J].
Chua, Peter .
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (04) :1179-1191
[22]   A sociological guilt trip: Comment [J].
Collins, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1997, 102 (06) :1558-1564
[23]  
Collins Randall., 1988, Durkheimian Sociology, P107, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511598258.006, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511598258.006]
[24]  
Conklin AliceL., 2013, In the Museum of Man: Race, Anthropology, and Empire in France, 1850-1950
[25]   The Northern theory of globalization [J].
Connell, Raewyn .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2007, 25 (04) :368-385
[26]  
Connell Raewyn., 2007, Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science
[27]   Why is classical theory classical? [J].
Connell, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1997, 102 (06) :1511-1557
[28]  
Costa Boatcaand., 2010, Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches, P13
[29]  
Douglas Mary., 2002, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
[30]  
Dubuisson D., 1998, OCCIDENT RELIG MYTHE