Embodied Mindfulness Questionnaire: Scale Development and Validation

被引:16
作者
Khoury, Bassam [1 ]
Vergara, Rodrigo C. [2 ]
Sadowski, Isabel [1 ]
Spinelli, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Metropolitana Ciencias Educ, Santiago, Chile
关键词
mindfulness; meditation; embodiment; scale; mind-body; questionnaire; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; EMOTION REGULATION; INITIAL VALIDATION; SELF-REPORT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RELAPSE PREVENTION; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; TOP-DOWN; ACCEPTANCE; MIND;
D O I
10.1177/10731911211059856
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recently developed mindfulness scales have integrated aspects of the body in measuring mindfulness unlike other established scales. However, these scales focused solely on body awareness and did not embrace all aspects of mindfulness and the body. Specifically, they did not integrate embodiment in mindfulness. The proposed Embodied Mindfulness Questionnaire (EMQ) aims to operationalize the proposed notion of "embodied mindfulness" by grounding it into five dimensions, each representing a set of skills that can be cultivated through training and practice: (a) Detachment from Automatic Thinking, (b) Attention and Awareness of Feelings and Bodily Sensations, (c) Connection with the Body, (d) Awareness of the Mind-Body Connection, and (e) Acceptance of Feelings and Bodily Sensations. The EMQ items were developed through consultations with a panel of eight graduate students and a group of 10 experts in the field. Results from a series of three studies supported the proposed five subscales of EMQ and suggested that these subscales are independent and supported by convergent and discriminant evidence. In addition, results suggested that scores of EMQ subscales are different in terms of sensitivity to mindfulness training or meditation practice and experience. Limitations, as well as theoretical and practical implications of the EMQ subscales, are thoroughly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 483
页数:26
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Counterclockwise: Mindful health and the power of possiblity
[2]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[3]   Assessment of mindfulness by self-report - The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Allen, KB .
ASSESSMENT, 2004, 11 (03) :191-206
[4]   Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples [J].
Baer, Ruth A. ;
Smith, Gregory T. ;
Lykins, Emily ;
Button, Daniel ;
Krietemeyer, Jennifer ;
Sauer, Shannon ;
Walsh, Erin ;
Duggan, Danielle ;
Williams, J. Mark G. .
ASSESSMENT, 2008, 15 (03) :329-342
[5]   THE 20-ITEM TORONTO-ALEXITHYMIA-SCALE .2. CONVERGENT, DISCRIMINANT, AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY [J].
BAGBY, RM ;
TAYLOR, GJ ;
PARKER, JDA .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1994, 38 (01) :33-40
[6]  
Bandalos D.L., 2010, REVIEWERS GUIDE QUAN, P93, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315755649-8
[7]   DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF A DISSOCIATION SCALE [J].
BERNSTEIN, EM ;
PUTNAM, FW .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1986, 174 (12) :727-735
[8]   Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition [J].
Bishop, SR ;
Lau, M ;
Shapiro, S ;
Carlson, L ;
Anderson, ND ;
Carmody, J ;
Segal, ZV ;
Abbey, S ;
Speca, M ;
Velting, D ;
Devins, G .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2004, 11 (03) :230-241
[9]   What do we really know about Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction? [J].
Bishop, SR .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2002, 64 (01) :71-83
[10]  
Blackledge JT, 2001, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V57, P243, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2<243::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO