Self-Reliance and Radical Democracy

被引：0

作者：

Laugier, Sandra ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, 1 Rue Glaciere, F-75013 Paris, France

[2] Inst Univ France, Inst Sci Jurid & Philosoph Sorbonne, 1 Rue Glaciere, F-75013 Paris, France

来源：

ALLGEMEINE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE | 2023年 / 48卷 / 02期

关键词：

radical democracy; civil disobedience; skepticism; perfectionism; voice; Emerson; Thoreau; Cavell;

D O I：

10.12857/AZP.910480220-5

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

The paper uses the political potential of perfectionism, developed in Emerson, Thoreau, and Cavell, to think of democracy as a form of life. Through an analysis of Emerson's concept of self-reliance, it is made clear that democracy as a form of life depends on the possibility that any arbitrary person can express her experiences in a voice in which resistance and dissent manifest themselves. This voice, which is distinguished from the individualism of liberalism, is discussed as an agency of a skeptical objection that keeps the "we" of the democratic form of life open to criticism.

引用

页码：255 / 274

页数：20

共 26 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1996, Die Offentlichkeit und Ihre Probleme

[2]

Cavell Stanley., 1990, CONDITIONS HANDSOME

[3]

Cavell Stanley, 2001, Nach der Philosophie. Essays, P75

[4]

Cavell Stanley, 2001, Nach der Philosophie, P37

[5]

Cavell Stanley., 1972, SENSES WALDEN

[6]

Cavell Stanley., 1989, THIS NEW YET UNAPPRO

[7]

Cavell Stanley, 2002, Die andere Stimme. Philosophie und Autobiographie

[8]

Cavell Stanley, 2006, Der Anspruch der Vernunft. Wittgenstein, Skeptizismus, Moral und Tragodie

[9]

Cavell Stanley., 2003, EMERSONS TRANSCENDEN, V1st

[10]

Cavell Stanley., 1969, MUST WE MEAN WHAT WE

← 1 2 3 →