Toward a better understanding of student engagement with peer feedback: a longitudinal study

被引:3
作者
Qian, Jinghua [2 ]
Li, Danli [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Foreign Languages& Literature, English Dept, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, English Dept, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING | 2025年 / 63卷 / 01期
关键词
student engagement; peer feedback; L2; writing; learner-related factors; context-related factors; WRITTEN-CORRECTIVE-FEEDBACK; LEARNER ENGAGEMENT; DIALOGUE;
D O I
10.1515/iral-2023-0108
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While the past two decades have witnessed enormous growth in research on student engagement with feedback on second language (L2) writing, little attention has been paid to student engagement with peer feedback longitudinally through peer feedback interaction. This study explored how 12 students engaged with peer feedback cognitively, behaviorally, and affectively over a semester of L2 writing and learning, and what factors influenced student engagement. Data were collected from peer feedback dialogue, multiple drafts of compositions, retrospective verbal reports, feedback notes, self-reflection, and focus groups. Data were analyzed through text analysis, content analysis, and thematic analysis. The findings revealed that student engagement with peer feedback varied over four writing tutorials. Face-to-face peer feedback contributed to maintaining sustainable student engagement with peer feedback. Other learner-related factors such as learner beliefs, language proficiency, product-oriented mindset, and context-related factors such as task requirements, feedback-related issues, and interaction patterns jointly influenced student engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 734
页数:26
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
  • [2] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [3] Celce-Murcia M., 2014, TEACHING ENGLISH 2 F, V4
  • [4] Damon W., 1989, PEER RELATIONSHIPS C, P135
  • [5] Quantity and quality of uptake: Examining surface and meaning-level feedback provided by peers and an instructor in a graduate research course
    Dressler, Roswita
    Chu, Man-Wai
    Crossman, Katie
    Hilman, Brianna
    [J]. ASSESSING WRITING, 2019, 39 : 14 - 24
  • [6] A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback EPILOGUE
    Ellis, Rod
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2010, 32 (02) : 335 - 349
  • [7] Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
    Fan, Yumei
    Xu, Jinfen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2020, 50
  • [8] Ferris D, 2019, CAM APPL L, P106
  • [9] Gray D., 2017, DOING RES REAL WORLD, V4th Editio
  • [10] Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations
    Han, Ye
    Hyland, Fiona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2019, 38 : 1 - 13