Environmental Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China

被引:16
作者
Cai, Lingzhi [1 ]
Guo, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Sch Marxism, Jiujiang 332005, Peoples R China
[2] Jiujiang Univ, Sch Management, Jiujiang 332005, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2023年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
environmental decentralization; environmental regulation; environmental pollution; threshold model; China; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PRODUCTIVITY; COMPETITION; FEDERALISM; INNOVATION; POLICIES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/158906
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental decentralization is an institutional factor that influences the effect of ecological environment governance. Based on panel data of provinces in China from 2008 to 2015, this paper evaluates the indicators of environmental decentralization, and uses a fixed-effect model and a threshold model to test the influence of environmental decentralization and environmental regulation on environmental pollution. The results indicate that China's environmental decentralization can significantly curb environmental pollution in general. There is a U-shaped relationship between environmental decentralization and environmental pollution. Reasonable environmental decentralization can restrain environmental pollution, while excessive environmental decentralization aggravates environmental pollution. There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between environmental regulation and environmental pollution. If the intensity of environmental regulation is too low, it cannot inhibit environmental pollution, while if the intensity of environmental regulation is increased to a certain level, it can help to inhibit environmental pollution. The joint impact of environmental decentralization and environmental regulation cannot reduce environmental pollution. That is, with the enlargement of environmental decentralization, environmental regulation fails to reduce environmental pollution. The effect of environmental decentralization has significant regional heterogeneity in economic development level and emission intensity. The above conclusions have important reference value for optimizing the environmental decentralization system and formulating scientific environmental decentralization policies.
引用
收藏
页码:2053 / 2068
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Impacts of the desulfurization price subsidy policy on SO2 reduction: Evidence from China's coal-fired power plants [J].
Ai, Hongshan ;
Zhou, Zhengqing ;
Li, Ke ;
Kang, Zhi-Yong .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 157
[2]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[3]  
[白俊红 Bai Junhong], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P59
[4]   The Political Science of Federalism [J].
Bednar, Jenna .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 7, 2011, 7 :269-288
[5]   Impact of Chinese market segmentation on regional collaborative governance of environmental pollution: A new approach to complex system theory [J].
Bian, Yuanchao ;
Song, Kaiyi ;
Bai, Junhong .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2021, 52 (01) :283-309
[6]   The Political Economy of Deforestation in the Tropics [J].
Burgess, Robin ;
Hansen, Matthew ;
Olken, Benjamin A. ;
Potapov, Peter ;
Sieber, Stefanie .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 127 (04) :1707-1754
[7]  
CAO Y., 2018, CERAM INT, V12, P36
[8]   Regulatory Environmental Federalism [J].
Dijkstra, Bouwe R. ;
Fredriksson, Per G. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 2, 2010, 2010, 2 :319-339
[9]   Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: Cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries [J].
Esso, Loesse Jacques ;
Keho, Yaya .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :492-497
[10]  
Fan Q., 2018, J. World Econ., V41, P171