Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Jiang, Sijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Shaobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang, Qingping [4 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Zhihai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Junyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Weihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Hunan Prov Key Lab Otolaryngol Crit Dis, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Brain Hosp Hunan Prov, Dept Rehabil, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
YOUNG-ADULTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1155/2023/9377518
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background. Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods. MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct electronic searches for clinical trials comparing ILIT and placebo in patients with AR. The final search took place on August 24, 2022. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes included combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), Skin-prick test (SPT), and adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesized as mean difference (MD)/standard mean difference (SMD) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results. Thirteen studies (454 participants) were included in this study. The ILIT group had better clinical improvement on the CSMS (random effects model, SMD-0.85, 95% CI [-1.58,-0.11], P = 0.02) and RQLQ (fixed-effects model, MD-0.42, 95% CI [0.69, 0.15], P = 0.003) than the placebo group. The booster injection was beneficial for CSMS (P < 0.0001), and the 4-week injection interval was superior to the 2-week injection period for improving VAS (P < 0.0001). Local swelling or erythema was the main AE following injection (random effects model, RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005). Discussion. For individuals with AR, ILIT is safe and effective. ILIT alleviates clinical symptoms and reduces pharmaceutical consumption without causing severe AEs. However, the validity of this study is compromised by the substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the included researches. Registration CRD42022355329.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Subcutaneous Versus Sublingual Immunotherapy for Adults with Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses
    Tie, Kevin
    Miller, Craig
    Zanation, Adam M.
    Ebert, Charles S., Jr.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (03) : 499 - 508
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic children allergic to house dust mite: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zheng, Chen
    Xu, Hao
    Huang, Shumin
    Chen, Zhimin
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of various corticosteroids in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Li, Yuxin
    Xiong, Jun
    Zhang, Zheng
    Liao, Kai
    Zho, Xiaohong
    Li, Jun
    Xiang, Jie
    Xu, Lingling
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (03) : 626 - 642
  • [44] Effectiveness and safety of indirect moxibustion for the treatment of allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
    Yuan, Ting
    Fu, Yong
    Xiong, Jun
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xue
    Fan, Hao
    Jiang, Yunfeng
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Liao, Kai
    Xu, Lingling
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E20911
  • [45] Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy for House Dust Mite Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Feng, Bohai
    Xiang, Haijie
    Jin, Haiyong
    Gao, Jinjian
    Huang, Saiyu
    Shi, Yunbin
    Chen, Ruru
    Chen, Bobei
    ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 9 (03) : 220 - 228
  • [46] The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Liang
    Wang, Xi-Ling
    Deng, Qing-Long
    Du, Yan-Qiu
    Zhao, Nai-Qing
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [47] The Impact of Bilastine on Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Abdelshafy, Aliaa M.
    Abdallah, Sara Y.
    Hassan, Ahmed F.
    Mohamed, Hazem A.
    Kamal, Nourhan M.
    Ali, Sohila T.
    Abdelhaleem, Ibrahim A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2022, 36 (05) : 684 - 694
  • [48] Effects of H1 antihistamine addition to intranasal corticosteroid for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
    Chitsuthipakorn, Wirach
    Kanjanawasee, Dichapong
    Khattiyawittayakun, Likhit
    Snidvongs, Kornkiat
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (10) : 1083 - 1092
  • [49] Intralymphatic immunotherapy with one or two allergens renders similar clinical response in patients with allergic rhinitis due to birch and grass pollen
    Ahlbeck, Lars
    Ahlberg, Emelie
    Bjorkander, Janne
    Alden, Caroline
    Papapavlou, Georgia
    Palmberg, Laura
    Nystrom, Ulla
    Retsas, Pavlos
    Nordenfelt, Patrik
    Togo, Totte
    Johansen, Pal
    Rolander, Bo
    Duchen, Karel
    Jenmalm, Maria C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2022, 52 (06) : 747 - 759
  • [50] The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuan, Ting
    Xiong, Jun
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xue
    Jiang, Yunfeng
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Liao, Kai
    Xu, Lingling
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 2020