Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Jiang, Sijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Shaobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang, Qingping [4 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Zhihai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Junyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Weihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Hunan Prov Key Lab Otolaryngol Crit Dis, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Brain Hosp Hunan Prov, Dept Rehabil, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
YOUNG-ADULTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1155/2023/9377518
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background. Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods. MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct electronic searches for clinical trials comparing ILIT and placebo in patients with AR. The final search took place on August 24, 2022. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes included combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), Skin-prick test (SPT), and adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesized as mean difference (MD)/standard mean difference (SMD) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results. Thirteen studies (454 participants) were included in this study. The ILIT group had better clinical improvement on the CSMS (random effects model, SMD-0.85, 95% CI [-1.58,-0.11], P = 0.02) and RQLQ (fixed-effects model, MD-0.42, 95% CI [0.69, 0.15], P = 0.003) than the placebo group. The booster injection was beneficial for CSMS (P < 0.0001), and the 4-week injection interval was superior to the 2-week injection period for improving VAS (P < 0.0001). Local swelling or erythema was the main AE following injection (random effects model, RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005). Discussion. For individuals with AR, ILIT is safe and effective. ILIT alleviates clinical symptoms and reduces pharmaceutical consumption without causing severe AEs. However, the validity of this study is compromised by the substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the included researches. Registration CRD42022355329.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Efficacy and Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiong, Limei
    Lin, Jilei
    Luo, Yin
    Chen, Wencong
    Dai, Jihong
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 181 (03) : 170 - 182
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A network meta-analysis
    Ji, Zao
    Jiang, Feifei
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [33] Efficacy of Capsaicin for Non-allergic Rhinitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiatong
    Zhang, Leilani
    Zheng, Kangyang
    CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, : 40 - 46
  • [34] Association of Abnormal Body Weight and Allergic Rhinitis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yeo, Brian Sheng Yep
    Guan, Elaine Jiaxin
    Ng, Kaiwen
    Lim, Yun Sun
    Goh, Ryan Tsui Hon
    Liu, Xuandao
    Phua, Chu Qin
    Tay, Kaijun
    Png, Lu Hui
    Xu, Shuhui
    Teo, Neville Wei Yang
    Charn, Tze Choong
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2025, 55 (02): : 142 - 165
  • [35] Intranasal Azelastine and Fluticasone as Combination Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Debbaneh, Peter M.
    Bareiss, Anna K.
    Wise, Sarah K.
    McCoul, Edward D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (03) : 412 - 418
  • [36] Effects of Probiotics on Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Farahmandi, Kajal
    Mohr, Alex E.
    McFarland, Lynne, V
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 440 - 450
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablets in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta- analysis
    Kulalert, Prapasri
    Phinyo, Phichayut
    Lao-Araya, Mongkol
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (09):
  • [38] Effectiveness and safety of probiotic therapy for pediatric allergic rhinitis management: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xia
    Tan, Xiangsheng
    Zhou, Jiwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 162
  • [39] The Prevalence, Clinical Picture, and Triggers of Allergic Rhinitis in Saudi Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aburiziza, Abdullah
    Almatrafi, Mohammed A.
    Alonazi, Aishah Saud
    Zatari, Mawaddah Hani
    Alqouzi, Samah Ali
    Mandili, Rasha Abdulaziz
    Hawsawi, Wedad Taher
    Aljohani, Rehab Hejji
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, 2022, 15 : 1831 - 1849
  • [40] Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients' sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Conforti, Fabio
    Pala, Laura
    Bagnardi, Vincenzo
    De Pas, Tommaso
    Martinetti, Marco
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Gelber, Richard D.
    Goldhirsch, Aron
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (06): : 737 - 746