Design Thinking as an Auxiliary Tool for Educational Robotics Classes

被引:9
作者
Tramonti, Michela [1 ]
Dochshanov, Alden Meirzhanovich [1 ]
Zhumabayeva, Assel Sagnayevna [2 ]
机构
[1] European Training & Res Assoc Cooperat Key Busines, I-04019 Terracina, Italy
[2] LN Gumilyev Eurasian Natl Univ, Fac Phys & Technol, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
3D printing; Arduino; educational robotics; design thinking; open-source project; open-source platform; INNOVATION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.3390/app13020858
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The dynamic spread of 3D printing technologies and open-source electronics prototyping platforms has significantly enriched the diversity of instruments used within educational robotics (ER) settings. An active, low-entry-level community offering ready-to-use libraries for a broad variety of devices assists in the development of quite sophisticated projects. However, the flipside of the coin is represented by the current research findings, which reveal that students' interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects has declined across Europe, as manifested in difficulties when approaching scientific topics and dealing with problems and phenomena studied from a multidisciplinary perspective. Consequently, a significant percentage of youths are at risk of social exclusion due to the direct relationship between low academic achievements and school dropout. Moreover, learners lack guidance in applied and life-context skills, such as creative thinking, problem solving, and collaboration, which highlights the need to introduce innovative pedagogical approaches. In this context, the design thinking (DT) methodology was proposed to tackle the problem. Originating in the development of psychological studies on creativity in the 1950s within the educational context, DT is known to foster creative thinking, help develop empathy, promote action-oriented actions, improve meta-cognitive awareness, contribute to problem-solving skills, and enhance students' imagination. The last point supports the students' development of critical thinking, social inclusion, teamwork skills, and academic performance. Thus, this paper introduces a methodological framework combining DT with ER classes. First, to approach the problem, the teachers' survey data were collected and analysed to reveal the respondents' level of integration of the DT methodology into current school curricula. Then, the work focused on the application of this framework in a learning experience by addressing the weakest points established and their elaboration through the combined ER and DT classes in the context of secondary schools.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[71]  
Tramonti M, 2021, DIGIT PRESENT PRESER, V11, P309
[72]  
Tsolou O., 2021, Creative Education, V12, P529, DOI [DOI 10.4236/CE.2021.123036, 10.4236/ce.2021.123036]
[73]  
Vattam SS., 2008, PRAGMAT COGN, V16, P406, DOI DOI 10.1075/PC.16.2.08VAT
[74]  
Vaughn M., 2013, Language Arts, V91, P81, DOI [DOI 10.58680/LA201324283, 10.58680/la201324283]
[75]   The determinants of dropping out in secondary education: A literature review [J].
Vinciguerra, A. ;
Nanty, I ;
Guillaumin, C. ;
Rusch, E. ;
Cornu, L. ;
Courtois, R. .
PSYCHOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 2021, 66 (01) :15-40
[76]   Effects of Online Problem-Solving Instruction and Identification Attitude Toward Instructional Strategies on Students' Creativity [J].
Wang, Yi-Ping .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
[77]   The importance of design thinking for technological literacy: a phenomenological perspective [J].
Wells, Alastair .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2013, 23 (03) :623-636
[78]  
Wiggins GP, 1993, Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing
[79]   Scaffolding design thinking in online STEM preservice teacher training [J].
Wu, Bian ;
Hu, Yiling ;
Wang, Minhong .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 50 (05) :2271-2287
[80]   Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments [J].
Yoon, Foo ;
Ho, Jeanne ;
Hedberg, John .
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS, 2005, 22 (3-4) :145-157