Short-term outcomes of different esophagojejunal anastomotic techniques during laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a network meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Aiolfi, Alberto [1 ]
Sozzi, Andrea [1 ]
Bonitta, Gianluca [1 ]
Lombardo, Francesca [1 ]
Cavalli, Marta [1 ]
Campanelli, Giampiero [1 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
Bona, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, St Ambrogio Hosp, IRCCS Osped Galeazzi, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth,Div Gen Surg, Via C Belgioioso n 173, I-20151 Milan, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 08期
关键词
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; Esophagojejunal anastomosis; Anastomosis technique; Leak; Stenosis; ASSISTED TOTAL GASTRECTOMY; GASTRIC-CANCER; LINEAR STAPLER; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; CIRCULAR STAPLER; INSERTED ANVIL; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10231-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDifferent techniques have been described for esophagojejunostomy (EJ) during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer. Linear stapled techniques include overlap (OL) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) while single staple technique (SST), hemi-double staple technique (HDST), and OrVil (R) are circular stapled approaches. Nowadays, the choice among techniques for EJ depends on operating surgeon personal preference.PurposeTo compare short-term outcomes of different EJ techniques during LTG.MethodsSystematic review and network meta-analysis. OL, FEEA, SST, HDST, and OrVil (R) were compared. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) and stenosis (AS). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to measure relative inference.ResultsOverall, 3177 patients (20 studies) were included. The technique for EJ was SST (n = 1026; 32.9%), OL (n = 826; 26.5%), FEEA (n = 752; 24.1%), OrVil (R) (n = 317; 10.1%), and HDST (n = 196; 6.4%). AL was comparable for OL vs. FEEA (RR = 0.82; 95% CrI 0.47-1.49), OL vs. SST (RR = 0.55; 95% CrI 0.27-1.21), OL vs. OrVil (R) (RR = 0.54; 95% CrI 0.32-1.22), and OL vs. HDST (RR = 0.65; 95% CrI 0.28-1.63). Similarly, AS was similar for OL vs. FEEA (RR = 0.46; 95% CrI 0.18-1.28), OL vs. SST (RR = 0.89; 95% CrI 0.39-2.15), OL vs. OrVil (R) (RR = 0.36; 95% CrI 0.14-1.02), and OL vs. HDST (RR = 0.61; 95% CrI 0.31-1.21). Anastomotic bleeding, time to soft diet resumption, pulmonary complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality were comparable while operative time was reduced for FEEA.ConclusionsThis network meta-analysis shows similar postoperative AL and AS risk when comparing OL, FEEA, SST, HDST, and OrVil (R) techniques. Similarly, no differences were found for anastomotic bleeding, operative time, soft diet resumption, pulmonary complications, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:5777 / 5790
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]   Linear stapling forms improved anastomoses during esophagojejunostomy after a total gastrectomy [J].
Matsui, H ;
Uyama, I ;
Sugioka, A ;
Fujita, J ;
Komori, Y ;
Ochiai, M ;
Hasumi, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (01) :58-60
[42]   Circular versus linear stapling oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Milone, Marco ;
Elmore, Ugo ;
Manigrasso, Michele ;
Vertaldi, Sara ;
Aprea, Giovanni ;
Servillo, Giuseppe ;
Parise, Paolo ;
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico ;
Rosati, Riccardo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 223 (05) :884-892
[43]   Esophagojejunostomy With Linear Staplers in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: Experience With 168 Cases in 5 Consecutive Years [J].
Miura, Susumu ;
Kanaya, Seiichiro ;
Hosogi, Hisahiro ;
Kawada, Hironori ;
Akagawa, Shin ;
Shimoike, Norihiro ;
Okumura, Shintaro ;
Okada, Toshihiro ;
Ito, Takeshi ;
Arimoto, Akira .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (05) :E101-E107
[44]   Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis [J].
Omori, Takeshi ;
Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi ;
Hara, Hisashi ;
Shinno, Naoki ;
Yamamoto, Masaaki ;
Fujita, Kohei ;
Kanemura, Takashi ;
Takeoka, Tomohira ;
Akita, Hirofumi ;
Wada, Hiroshi ;
Yasui, Masayoshi ;
Matsuda, Chu ;
Nishimura, Junichi ;
Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki ;
Miyata, Hiroshi ;
Ohue, Masayuki ;
Sakon, Masato .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (08) :6223-6234
[45]   Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage of Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer [J].
Oshi, Masanori ;
Kunisaki, Chikara ;
Miyamoto, Hiroshi ;
Kosaka, Takashi ;
Akiyama, Hirotoshi ;
Endo, Itaru .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 35 (01) :28-34
[46]   Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling [J].
Park, Ki Bum ;
Kim, Eun Young ;
Song, Kyo Young .
JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2019, 19 (03) :344-354
[47]   Technique of esophagojejunostomy using transoral placement of the pretilted anvil head after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Sakuramoto, Shinichi ;
Kikuchi, Shiro ;
Futawatari, Nobue ;
Moriya, Hiromitsu ;
Katada, Natsuya ;
Yamashita, Keishi ;
Watanabe, Masahiko .
SURGERY, 2010, 147 (05) :742-747
[48]   Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis [J].
Salanti, Georgia ;
Del Giovane, Cinzia ;
Chaimani, Anna ;
Caldwell, Deborah M. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07)
[49]   Safety assessment of robotic gastrectomy and analysis of surgical learning process: a multicenter cohort study [J].
Shimoike, Norihiro ;
Nishigori, Tatsuto ;
Yamashita, Yoshito ;
Kondo, Masato ;
Manaka, Dai ;
Kadokawa, Yoshio ;
Itami, Atsushi ;
Kanaya, Seiichiro ;
Hosogi, Hisahiro ;
Satoh, Seiji ;
Hata, Hiroaki ;
Kan, Takatsugu ;
Kawada, Hironori ;
Yamamoto, Michihiro ;
Tanaka, Eiji ;
Tsunoda, Shigeru ;
Hisamori, Shigeo ;
Hida, Koya ;
Ueno, Kentaro ;
Tanaka, Shiro ;
Obama, Kazutaka .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2022, 25 (04) :817-826
[50]   Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach [J].
Sierzega, M. ;
Kolodziejczyk, P. ;
Kulig, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (07) :1035-1042