Short-term outcomes of different esophagojejunal anastomotic techniques during laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a network meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Aiolfi, Alberto [1 ]
Sozzi, Andrea [1 ]
Bonitta, Gianluca [1 ]
Lombardo, Francesca [1 ]
Cavalli, Marta [1 ]
Campanelli, Giampiero [1 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
Bona, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, St Ambrogio Hosp, IRCCS Osped Galeazzi, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth,Div Gen Surg, Via C Belgioioso n 173, I-20151 Milan, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 08期
关键词
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; Esophagojejunal anastomosis; Anastomosis technique; Leak; Stenosis; ASSISTED TOTAL GASTRECTOMY; GASTRIC-CANCER; LINEAR STAPLER; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; CIRCULAR STAPLER; INSERTED ANVIL; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10231-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDifferent techniques have been described for esophagojejunostomy (EJ) during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer. Linear stapled techniques include overlap (OL) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) while single staple technique (SST), hemi-double staple technique (HDST), and OrVil (R) are circular stapled approaches. Nowadays, the choice among techniques for EJ depends on operating surgeon personal preference.PurposeTo compare short-term outcomes of different EJ techniques during LTG.MethodsSystematic review and network meta-analysis. OL, FEEA, SST, HDST, and OrVil (R) were compared. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) and stenosis (AS). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to measure relative inference.ResultsOverall, 3177 patients (20 studies) were included. The technique for EJ was SST (n = 1026; 32.9%), OL (n = 826; 26.5%), FEEA (n = 752; 24.1%), OrVil (R) (n = 317; 10.1%), and HDST (n = 196; 6.4%). AL was comparable for OL vs. FEEA (RR = 0.82; 95% CrI 0.47-1.49), OL vs. SST (RR = 0.55; 95% CrI 0.27-1.21), OL vs. OrVil (R) (RR = 0.54; 95% CrI 0.32-1.22), and OL vs. HDST (RR = 0.65; 95% CrI 0.28-1.63). Similarly, AS was similar for OL vs. FEEA (RR = 0.46; 95% CrI 0.18-1.28), OL vs. SST (RR = 0.89; 95% CrI 0.39-2.15), OL vs. OrVil (R) (RR = 0.36; 95% CrI 0.14-1.02), and OL vs. HDST (RR = 0.61; 95% CrI 0.31-1.21). Anastomotic bleeding, time to soft diet resumption, pulmonary complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality were comparable while operative time was reduced for FEEA.ConclusionsThis network meta-analysis shows similar postoperative AL and AS risk when comparing OL, FEEA, SST, HDST, and OrVil (R) techniques. Similarly, no differences were found for anastomotic bleeding, operative time, soft diet resumption, pulmonary complications, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:5777 / 5790
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Sozzi, Andrea
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Lombardo, Francesca
    Cavalli, Marta
    Cirri, Silvia
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Danelli, Piergiorgio
    Bona, Davide
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (08) : 3297 - 3309
  • [2] Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic distal gastrectomy for early and locally advanced gastric cancer
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Lombardo, Francesca
    Matsushima, Kazuhide
    Sozzi, Andrea
    Cavalli, Marta
    Panizzo, Valerio
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Bona, Davide
    [J]. SURGERY, 2021, 170 (03) : 942 - 951
  • [3] Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bona, Davide
    Riva, Carlo Galdino
    Micheletto, Giancarlo
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Olmo, Giorgia
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Bonavina, Luigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (02): : 147 - 155
  • [4] Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Tornese, Stefania
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Micheletto, Giancarlo
    Bona, Davide
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (06) : 985 - 994
  • [5] Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer
    Ali, Bandar Idrees
    Park, Cho Hyun
    Song, Kyo Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2016, 16 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [6] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [7] Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy During the Early Introduction of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in the Netherlands A Population-based Cohort Study
    Brenkman, Hylke J. F.
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Slaman, Annelijn E.
    Goense, Lucas
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (05) : 831 - 838
  • [8] The safety of esophagojejunostomy via a transorally inserted-anvil method vs extracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler during total gastrectomy for Siewert type 2 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
    Chen, Xin-Hua
    Hu, Yan-Feng
    Luo, Jun
    Chen, Yue-Hong
    Liu, Hao
    Lin, Tian
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Guo-Xin
    Yu, Jiang
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2020, 8 (03): : 242 - 251
  • [9] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™): a preliminary, single institution experience
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Macri, Giuseppe
    Indennitate, Giampiero
    Mallardi, Beatrice
    Trallori, Giacomo
    Biagini, Maria Rosa
    Badii, Benedetta
    Staderini, Fabio
    Perigli, Giuliano
    [J]. SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3 : 1 - 6
  • [10] Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Laird, Nan
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 45 : 139 - 145