Numerical analysis on mechanical behavior of steel-concrete composite beams under fire

被引:3
作者
Wang, Wenjun [1 ]
Jiang, Binhui [1 ,3 ]
Ding, Fa-xing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Engn Technol Res Ctr Prefabricated Construct Indus, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
deformation stage; failure mode; finite element (FE); steel-concrete composite beam; stress distribution; ultimate flexural capacity; SLABS; RESISTANCE; COLUMNS;
D O I
10.1002/tal.2012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper investigated the fire behavior of steel-concrete composite beams (SCB) and partially encased steel-concrete composite beams (PEB) through numerical analysis. The numerical models established by the software ABAQUS were verified against experimental results. Parametric studies were performed to study the influences of load ratio, strength of concrete and steel, width of concrete slab, size of steel beam, fire protection layer, and degree of shear connection on the fire behavior of SCB and PEB. The analysis results show that the deformation stages of SCB and PEB under fire both go through four stages: elastic, elastic-plastic, plastic small deformation, and plastic large deformation. The web of SCB experiences a tension-compression-tension process under fire, and the bottom flange of PEB may even change from tension to compression at a lower load ratio. The failure mode of PEB, whether the concrete is crushed, depends on the load ratio. When SCB fails, the concrete is crushed and only the bottom flange of the steel beam yields. Under various parameters, the fire resistance of SCB is about 22 min, while the fire resistance of PEB is 82-93 min under a load of 0.4. When the load ratio increases from 0.2 to 0.6, the fire resistance of SCB decreases by 8 min, while that of PEB decreases by 110 min. To meet class I fire resistance rating under a normal service load ratio of 0.4, additional measures for PEB are still required, and at least 15 mm of fire protection layer is required for the steel beam of SCB. Finally, considering the temperature internal fore, a coefficient related to the fire time was introduced to modify the formula of ultimate flexural capacity of SCB and PEB, which showed good accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Fire behavior and resistance of partially encased and slim-floor composite beams [J].
Ahn, Jae-Kwon ;
Lee, Cheol-Ho .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 129 :276-285
[2]   Numerical study on the flexural behaviour of slim-floor beams with hollow core slabs at elevated temperature [J].
Albero, V. ;
Espinos, A. ;
Serra, E. ;
Romero, M. L. ;
Hospitaler, A. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 180 :561-573
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 13407 ISO, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Design of steel structures-Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1993-1-1:2005
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LOAD RES FACT DES SP
[6]   Behavior of steel bridge girders under fire conditions [J].
Aziz, Esam M. ;
Kodur, Venkatesh K. ;
Glassman, Jonathan D. ;
Garlock, Maria E. Moreyra .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2015, 106 :11-22
[7]  
British Standard 476, 1987, 476 BRIT STAND I
[8]  
BS EN1993-1-2, 2003, EN199312 BS
[9]  
BS-5950-3.1, 1990, BS595031
[10]   Behavior of concrete and concrete-filled circular steel tubular stub columns at constant high temperatures [J].
Ding Fa-xing ;
Yu Zhi-wu .
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (06) :726-732