Brazilian payment for environmental services programs emphasize water-related services

被引:8
作者
Mamedes, Ingrid [1 ]
Guerra, Angelica [2 ]
Rodrigues, Dulce B. B. [1 ]
Garcia, Leticia Couto [3 ]
Godoi, Raquel de Faria [4 ]
Oliveira, Paulo Tarso S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Engn Architecture & Urbanism & Geog, BR-79070900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Programa Posgrad Ecol & Conservacao, Campo Grande, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Lab Ecol Intervencao LEI, Inst Biociencias, Campo Grande, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Hydraul & Sanit Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Conservation funding; Ecological restoration; Environmental compliance; Public policy; Soil and water conservation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; VEGETATION RESTORATION; LAND; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; SOIL; CONSERVATION; PES; PARTICIPATION; OPPORTUNITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.01.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on "user pays" and "provider gets" principles, the Payment for Environmental Services (PES) consists of providing economic incentives or compensation for land users who adopt activities that promote ecosystem services. These PES initiatives have grown rapidly in Brazil over the last few decades, however, studies that address the panorama of these programs in the country are still scarce, regional, or outdated. Here, we investigate the PES overview in Brazil through interviews and an extensive literature review. We found in total 80 PES programs implemented in Brazil, of which 14 were closed. The pro-grams are poorly distributed across the country, mostly concentrated in the Atlantic Forest (56.25%) and Savanna (36.25%) biomes, in Southeastern Brazil. The majority of programs primarily prioritize improving water quality and quantity. Therefore, reforestation, protection of native vegetation, and soil and water conservation are their main proposed practices. The positive impacts of Brazil's PES experi-ences are evident; while the lack of transparency and monitoring, and poor spatial and financial dis-tribution are still major limitations. We conclude that if correctly implemented, PES schemes offer a path to reconcile environmental conservation with agricultural production in Brazil.(c) 2023 International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation, China Water and Power Press, and China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 289
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services
    Chu, Long
    Grafton, R. Quentin
    Keenan, Rodney
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 156 : 202 - 210
  • [32] Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll
    Murtinho, Felipe
    Hayes, Tanya
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 59 (06) : 939 - 955
  • [33] Not the same for everyone: Community views of Mexico's payment for environmental services programmes
    Almeida-Lenero, Lucia
    Revollo-Fernandez, Daniel
    Caro-Borrero, Angela
    Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel
    Corbera, Esteve
    Mazari-Hiriart, Marisa
    Figueroa, Fernanda
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 44 (03) : 201 - 211
  • [34] Quantifying and mapping of water-related ecosystem services for enhancing the security of the food-water-energy nexus in tropical data-sparse catchment
    Sahle, Mesfin
    Saito, Osamu
    Fuest, Christine
    Yeshitela, Kumelachew
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 646 : 573 - 586
  • [35] Payment for Environmental Services and Unequal Resource Control in Pimampiro, Ecuador
    de Francisco, Jean Carlo Rodriguez
    Budds, Jessica
    Boelens, Rutgerd
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (10) : 1217 - 1233
  • [36] Payment Vs. Compensation For Ecosystem Services: Do Words Have A Voice In The Design of Environmental Conservation Programs?
    Clot, Sophie
    Grolleau, Gilles
    Meral, Philippe
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 135 : 299 - 303
  • [37] Evaluating the impacts of Payment for Ecosystem Services (water supplies) in an agricultural system of the Brazilian Cerrado
    De Oliveira, Franciele De Kassia
    Santos, Carolina Emilia Dos
    Siqueira, Mariana N.
    Passos, Haihani S.
    Morais, Alessandro R.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2023, 95 (02):
  • [38] Farmers' Willingness to Participate in Payment-for-Environmental-Services Programmes
    Ma, Shan
    Swinton, Scott M.
    Lupi, Frank
    Jolejole-Foreman, Christina
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 63 (03) : 604 - 626
  • [39] ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCE AND APPLICATION IN BRAZILIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
    Folharini, Saulo de Oliveira
    de Oliveira, Regina Celia
    GEOAMBIENTE ON-LINE, 2020, (38): : 210 - 229
  • [40] Applicability, Potential and Payment Challenges for Environmental Services on Water Conservation in Southern Brazil
    dos Santos, Franciele Lausch
    Silvano, Renato Azevedo Matias
    DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2016, 38 : 481 - 498