Combining acoustic localisation and high-resolution land cover classification to study predator vocalisation behaviour

被引:3
作者
Bru, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Bethany R. [3 ,4 ]
Butkiewicz, Hannah [5 ]
Fontaine, Amy C. [6 ]
Dassow, Angela [7 ]
Owens, Jessica L. [8 ]
Root-Gutteridge, Holly [9 ]
Schindler, Loretta [10 ]
Kershenbaum, Arik [1 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB3 0JG, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[3] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Anim Rural & Environm Sci, Brackenhurst Lane, Southwell NG25 0QF, England
[4] Mammal Soc, Dorset DT11 0BL, England
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Nat Resources, 2100 Main St, Stevens Point, WI 54481 USA
[6] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[7] Carthage Coll, Biol Dept, 2001 Alford Pk Dr, Kenosha, WI 53140 USA
[8] Unleashed Training LLC, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 USA
[9] Univ Lincoln, Sch Life Sci, Beevor St, Lincoln LN6 7DL, England
[10] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Zool, Prague 12844, Czech Republic
[11] Univ Cambridge, Girton Coll, Cambridge CB3 0JG, England
关键词
anthropogenic disturbance; bioacoustics; Canis latrans; Canis lupus; habitat selection; howl; multilateration; passive acoustic monitoring; remote sensing; ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; SOUND-TRANSMISSION; CANIS-LUPUS; HABITAT USE; CONSERVATION; COYOTES; WOLVES; URBAN; AREA; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1071/WR22007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. The ecology of cryptic animals is difficult to study without invasive tagging approaches or labour-intensive field surveys. Acoustic localisation provides an effective way to locate vocalising animals using acoustic recorders. Combining this with land cover classification gives new insight into wild animal behaviour using non-invasive tools. Aims. This study aims to demonstrate how acoustic localisation - combined with high-resolution land cover classification - permits the study of the ecology of vocalising animals in the wild. We illustrate this technique by investigating the effect of land cover and distances to anthropogenic features on coyote and wolf vocal behaviour. Methods. We collected recordings over 13 days in Wisconsin, USA, and triangulated vocalising animals' locations using acoustic localisation. We then mapped these locations onto land cover using a high-resolution land cover map we produced for the area. Key results. Neither coyotes nor wolves vocalised more in one habitat type over another. Coyotes vocalised significantly closer to all human features than expected by chance, whereas wolves vocalised significantly further away. When vocalising closer to human features, coyotes selected forests but wolves showed no habitat preference. Conclusions. This novel combination of two sophisticated, autonomous sensing-driven tools permits us to examine animal land use and behavioural ecology using passive sensors, with the aim of drawing ecologically important conclusions. Implications. We envisage that this method can be used at larger scales to aid monitoring of vocally active animals across landscapes. Firstly, it permits us to characterise habitat use while vocalising, which is an essential behaviour for many species. Furthermore, if combined with additional knowledge of how a species' habitat selection while vocalising relates to its general habitat use, this method could permit the derivation of future conclusions on prevailing landscape use. In summary, this study demonstrates the potential of integrating acoustic localisation with land cover classification in ecological research.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 979
页数:15
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods [J].
Acevedo, Miguel A. ;
Corrada-Bravo, Carlos J. ;
Corrada-Bravo, Hector ;
Villanueva-Rivera, Luis J. ;
Aide, T. Mitchell .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 4 (04) :206-214
[2]   Male painted gobies (Pomatoschistus pictus) vocalise to defend territories [J].
Amorim, M. C. P. ;
Neves, A. S. M. .
BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 145 :1065-1083
[3]   A reassessment of the interface between conservation and behaviour [J].
Angeloni, Lisa ;
Schlaepfer, Martin A. ;
Lawler, Joshua J. ;
Crooks, Kevin R. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 75 :731-737
[4]   Adaptive monitoring: using citizen scientists to track wolf populations when winter-track counts become unreliable [J].
Balciauskas, Linas ;
Balciauskiene, Laima ;
Litvaitis, John A. ;
Tijusas, Eugenijus .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 48 (01) :76-85
[5]  
Batista GEAPA, 2003, APPL ARTIF INTELL, V17, P519, DOI [10.1080/713827181, 10.1080/08839510390219309]
[6]   A systematic survey of the integration of animal behavior into conservation [J].
Berger-Tal, Oded ;
Blumstein, Daniel T. ;
Carroll, Scott ;
Fisher, Robert N. ;
Mesnick, Sarah L. ;
Owen, Megan A. ;
Saltz, David ;
St Claire, Colleen Cassady ;
Swaisgood, Ronald R. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (04) :744-753
[7]  
Boitani L, 2012, TECH ECOL CONSERVAT, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558520.001.0001
[8]   Howling by the river: howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) communication in an anthropogenically-altered riparian forest in Costa Rica [J].
Bolt, Laura M. ;
Russell, Dorian G. ;
Coggeshall, Elizabeth M. C. ;
Jacobson, Zachary S. ;
Merrigan-Johnson, Carrie ;
Schreier, Amy L. .
BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 157 (01) :77-100
[9]   Supervised classification and mathematical optimization [J].
Carrizosa, Emilio ;
Romero Morales, Dolores .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 40 (01) :150-165
[10]   Unsupervised land cover classification of SAR images by contour tracing [J].
Chamundeeswari, V. V. ;
Singh, D. ;
Singh, K. .
IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, :547-550