The clinical value of progesterone receptor expression in luminal breast cancer: A study of a large cohort with long-term follow-up

被引:14
作者
Lashen, Ayat G. [1 ,2 ]
Toss, Michael S. [1 ,3 ]
Mongan, Nigel P. [4 ,5 ]
Green, Andrew R. [1 ,6 ]
Rakha, Emad A. [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Acad Unit Translat Med Sci, Nottingham, England
[2] Menoufia Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Shibin Al Kawm, Egypt
[3] Sheffield Teaching Hosp Fdn NHS Trust, Dept Histopathol, Sheffield, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Nottingham, England
[5] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Breast Canc Res Ctr, Nottingham, England
[7] Hamad Med Corp, Dept Pathol, Doha, Qatar
[8] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Histopathol, West Corridor,Nottingham City Hosp Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
关键词
assessment; breast cancer; endocrine therapy; Ki67; PR; CENTRALLY REVIEWED EXPRESSION; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; HORMONE-RECEPTORS; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; HER2; STATUS; THERAPY; IMPACT; ALPHA; KI67;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.34655
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe routine assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) expression in breast cancer (BC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PR expression in luminal BC, with emphasis on the definition of positivity and its prognostic significance as compared to Ki67 expression. MethodsA large cohort (n = 1924) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative BC was included. PR was immunohistochemically (IHC) stained on full face sections and core needle biopsies (CNB) where the optimal scoring cutoff was evaluated. In addition, the association of PR with other clinicopathological factors, cellular proliferation, disease outcome, and response to adjuvant therapy were analyzed. ResultsAlthough several cutoffs showed prognostic significance, the optimal cutoff to categorize PR expression into two clinically distinct prognostic groups on CNB was 10%. PR negativity showed a significant association with features of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Multivariate analyses indicated that the association between PR negativity and poor outcome was independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67. PR negativity showed independent association with shorter survival in patients who received endocrine therapy whereas Ki67did not. ConclusionPR IHC expression provides independent prognostic value superior to Ki67. Routine assessment of PR expression in BC using 10% cutoff in the clinical setting is recommended. Plain Language Summary In this study, we have established an optimal approach to determine the prognostic value of progesterone receptor expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.To do this, the levels of progesterone receptor were measured in a large cohort of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.We have refined the definition of progesterone receptor positivity in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.We show that progesterone receptor expression adds prognostic and predictive value of endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients, and our results show that the absence of progesterone receptor is associated with poorer outcomes independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67 expression.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1194
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    Dowsett, Mitchell
    McKernin, Shannon E.
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Fitzgibbons, Patrick L.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Lakhani, Sunil R.
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Perlmutter, Jane
    Perou, Charles M.
    Regan, Meredith M.
    Rimm, David L.
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    Torlakovic, Emina E.
    Varella, Leticia
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Weisberg, Tracey F.
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 1346 - +
  • [2] Issues and updates: evaluating estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and HER2 in breast cancer
    Allred, D. Craig
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : S52 - S59
  • [3] Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls
    Andersen, Per Kragh
    Geskus, Ronald B.
    de Witte, Theo
    Putter, Hein
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (03) : 861 - 870
  • [4] Progesterone receptors - animal models and cell signaling in breast cancer - The role of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human mammary development and tumorigenesis
    Anderson, E
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 4 (05): : 197 - 201
  • [5] Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC)
    Arnedos, M.
    Nerurkar, A.
    Osin, P.
    A'Hern, R.
    Smith, I. E.
    Dowsett, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (12) : 1948 - 1952
  • [6] Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer
    Asogan, Aravind Barathi
    Hong, Ga Sze
    Prabhakaran, Subash Kumar Arni
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (03) : 145 - 149
  • [7] Biswal Ashley, 2019, J Clin Med Res, V11, P407, DOI 10.14740/jocmr3803
  • [8] The impact of progesterone receptor expression on prognosis of patients with rapidly proliferating, hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the IBIS 3 trial
    Bravaccini, Sara
    Bronte, Giuseppe
    Scarpi, Emanuela
    Ravaioli, Sara
    Maltoni, Roberta
    Mangia, Anita
    Tumedei, Maria Maddalena
    Puccetti, Maurizio
    Serra, Patrizia
    Gianni, Lorenzo
    Amaducci, Laura
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    Bounous, Valentina
    Paradiso, Angelo Virgilio
    Silvestrini, Rosetta
    Amadori, Dino
    Rocca, Andrea
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [9] X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization
    Camp, RL
    Dolled-Filhart, M
    Rimm, DL
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (21) : 7252 - 7259
  • [10] Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Voduc, David
    Gao, Dongxia
    Leung, Samuel
    Snider, Jacqueline
    Watson, Mark
    Davies, Sherri
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Parker, Joel S.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10): : 736 - 750