Lessons learned from farmers' experience of soil carbon management practices in grazing regimes of Australia

被引:5
作者
Amin, Md Nurul [1 ,2 ]
de Bruyn, Lisa Lobry [1 ]
Lawson, Andrew [3 ]
Wilson, Brian [1 ]
Hossain, Md Sarwar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[2] Patuakhali Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Patuakhali, Bangladesh
[3] Univ New England, Australian Ctr Agr & Law, Sch Law, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Glasgow, Sch Interdisciplinary Studies, Environm Sci & Sustainabil, Dumfries, Scotland
关键词
Soil stewardship; Land capability; Carbon sequestration; Rotational grazing; Soil health; ORGANIC-CARBON; LAND-USE; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; SEQUESTRATION; CHALLENGES; GRASSLAND; STOCKS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-022-00863-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Previous research on increasing soil carbon sequestration, through soil carbon management (SCM), has not integrated social components into the ecological system. To understand how experienced farmers combine social and ecological components of soil carbon management practices, we have used a social-ecological systems (SES) framework. This study examines the distribution and pattern of farmers' SCM practices, comparing and contrasting two farming cohorts based on inherent soil fertility in a rotational grazing regime of sub-tropical temperate grazing lands in Australia. Twenty-five grazing farmers with the land of low (n= 13) and moderate (n=12) fertility soils were interviewed about SCM and how they have maintained their grazing regime despite climatic constraints using the SES framework. Both farming cohorts (low-fertility farms and moderate-fertility farms) have shown resolve to continue their grazing regime because the benefits were manifold and affected the whole-farm sustainability. Farmers with low-fertility farms highlighted a number of SCM outcomes but were less confident of achieving them. Farmers were focused on the agri-environmental benefits of SCM practices in a holistic manner, rather than a single goal of increasing soil carbon. The interviewed farmers reported a number of benefits that accrue from their grazing regimes, including improvements in production, soil moisture retention, and soil health, even though some of these benefits were not measured. Farmers in more "stressed " environments, with low soil fertility, also emphasized mental health and landscape esthetics as outcomes of SCM. These features of the farmers' SCM provide important benefits that are not easily quantified but are also instrumental in encouraging other farmers to manage their soil. Long-term practitioners of rotational grazing such as the farmers in this study can provide useful insights for a more targeted, customized, and nuanced government policy that focuses on whole-farm sustainability, which can also improve soil carbon stocks in similar regions of Australia.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ruminating on soil carbon: Applying current understanding to inform grazing management
    Stanley, Paige L.
    Wilson, Chris
    Patterson, Erica
    Machmuller, Megan
    Cotrufo, M. Francesca
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03)
  • [42] Soil carbon lost from Mollisols of the North Central USA with 20 years of agricultural best management practices
    Sanford, Gregg R.
    Posner, Joshua L.
    Jackson, Randall D.
    Kucharik, Christopher J.
    Hedtcke, Janet L.
    Lin, Ting-Li
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 162 : 68 - 76
  • [43] Effects of Cultivation and Alternative Vineyard Management Practices on Soil Carbon Storage in Diverse Mediterranean Landscapes: A Review of the Literature
    Eldon, Jon
    Gershenson, Alexander
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2015, 39 (05) : 516 - 550
  • [44] Experience with patterns of change in soil carbon resulting from forest plantation establishment in eastern Australia
    Turner, J
    Lambert, MJ
    Johnson, DW
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 220 (1-3) : 259 - 269
  • [45] COST-EFFECTIVE PLACEMENT OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN A WATERSHED: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT
    Kurkalova, Lyubov A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2015, 51 (02): : 359 - 372
  • [46] Quantifying carbon for agricultural soil management: from the current status toward a global soil information system
    Paustian, Keith
    Collier, Sarah
    Baldock, Jeff
    Burgess, Rachel
    Creque, Jeff
    DeLonge, Marcia
    Dungait, Jennifer
    Ben Ellert
    Frank, Stefan
    Goddard, Torn
    Govaerts, Bram
    Grundy, Mike
    Henning, Mark
    Izaurralde, R. Cesar
    Madaras, Mikulas
    McConkey, Brian
    Porzig, Elizabeth
    Rice, Charles
    Searle, Ross
    Seavy, Nathaniel
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Mulhern, William
    Jahn, Molly
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2019, 10 (06) : 567 - 587
  • [47] Soil carbon benchmarks and cropland management effects: Insights from the Bavarian soil organic matter monitoring
    Suemmerer, Manuel
    Just, Christopher
    Wiesmeier, Martin
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2025, 40
  • [48] Soil organic carbon dynamics from agricultural management practices under climate change
    Herzfeld, Tobias
    Heinke, Jens
    Rolinski, Susanne
    Mueller, Christoph
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2021, 12 (04) : 1037 - 1055
  • [49] Sustainability of farmers' soil fertility management practices: A case study in the North China Plain
    Zhen, Lin
    Zoebisch, Michael A.
    Chen, Guibao
    Feng, Zhiming
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (04) : 409 - 419
  • [50] Farmers' Use of Nutrient Management: Lessons from Watershed Case Studies
    Osmond, Deanna L.
    Hoag, Dana L. K.
    Luloff, Al E.
    Meals, Donald W.
    Neas, Kathy
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (02) : 382 - 390