Lessons learned from farmers' experience of soil carbon management practices in grazing regimes of Australia

被引:5
作者
Amin, Md Nurul [1 ,2 ]
de Bruyn, Lisa Lobry [1 ]
Lawson, Andrew [3 ]
Wilson, Brian [1 ]
Hossain, Md Sarwar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[2] Patuakhali Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Patuakhali, Bangladesh
[3] Univ New England, Australian Ctr Agr & Law, Sch Law, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Glasgow, Sch Interdisciplinary Studies, Environm Sci & Sustainabil, Dumfries, Scotland
关键词
Soil stewardship; Land capability; Carbon sequestration; Rotational grazing; Soil health; ORGANIC-CARBON; LAND-USE; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; SEQUESTRATION; CHALLENGES; GRASSLAND; STOCKS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-022-00863-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Previous research on increasing soil carbon sequestration, through soil carbon management (SCM), has not integrated social components into the ecological system. To understand how experienced farmers combine social and ecological components of soil carbon management practices, we have used a social-ecological systems (SES) framework. This study examines the distribution and pattern of farmers' SCM practices, comparing and contrasting two farming cohorts based on inherent soil fertility in a rotational grazing regime of sub-tropical temperate grazing lands in Australia. Twenty-five grazing farmers with the land of low (n= 13) and moderate (n=12) fertility soils were interviewed about SCM and how they have maintained their grazing regime despite climatic constraints using the SES framework. Both farming cohorts (low-fertility farms and moderate-fertility farms) have shown resolve to continue their grazing regime because the benefits were manifold and affected the whole-farm sustainability. Farmers with low-fertility farms highlighted a number of SCM outcomes but were less confident of achieving them. Farmers were focused on the agri-environmental benefits of SCM practices in a holistic manner, rather than a single goal of increasing soil carbon. The interviewed farmers reported a number of benefits that accrue from their grazing regimes, including improvements in production, soil moisture retention, and soil health, even though some of these benefits were not measured. Farmers in more "stressed " environments, with low soil fertility, also emphasized mental health and landscape esthetics as outcomes of SCM. These features of the farmers' SCM provide important benefits that are not easily quantified but are also instrumental in encouraging other farmers to manage their soil. Long-term practitioners of rotational grazing such as the farmers in this study can provide useful insights for a more targeted, customized, and nuanced government policy that focuses on whole-farm sustainability, which can also improve soil carbon stocks in similar regions of Australia.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From Practices to Values: Farmers' Relationship with Soil Biodiversity in Europe
    Herve, Morgane E. T.
    Renault, Michel
    Plaas, Elke
    Schuette, Rebekka
    Potthoff, Martin
    Cluzeau, Daniel
    Nicolai, Annegret
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2020, 60 (03) : 596 - 620
  • [32] Optimal Fire Regimes for Soil Carbon Storage in Tropical Savannas of Northern Australia
    Anna E. Richards
    Garry D. Cook
    Brian T. Lynch
    Ecosystems, 2011, 14 : 503 - 518
  • [33] Amping up soil carbon: soil carbon stocks in California rangelands under adaptive multi-paddock and conventional grazing management
    Stanley, Paige
    Roche, Leslie
    Bowles, Timothy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [34] Implementing marine ecosystem-based management: lessons from Australia
    Smith, David C.
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Apfel, Petrina
    Cresswell, Ian D.
    Gillanders, Bronwyn M.
    Haward, Marcus
    Sainsbury, Keith J.
    Smith, Anthony D. M.
    Vince, Joanna
    Ward, Tim M.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (07) : 1990 - 2003
  • [35] A roadmap to building first responder networks: Lessons learned and best practices from Belgium and Switzerland
    Moens, Esther
    Degraeuwe, Eva
    Caputo, Maria Luce
    Cresta, Ruggero
    Arys, Robin
    Van Moorter, Nina
    Tackaert, Thomas
    Benvenuti, Claudio
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Vercammen, Steven
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2023, 16
  • [36] Assessment of Soil Carbon Stock and Soil Quality in Different Forest Stands and Management Regimes in Terai Region of Nepal
    Kandel, Durga
    Timilsina, Sachin
    Ayer, Santosh
    Chaudhary, Saroj Kumar
    Gautam, Jeetendra
    Adhikari, Rabindra
    Bhatta, Kishor Prasad
    SCIENTIFICA, 2024, 2024
  • [37] Analysis of Adoption of Soil Nutrient Management Practices: A Case of Rice Farmers in Liberia
    Apeh, Chikamso Christian
    Chiemela, Stella Nwawulu
    Apeh, Andrew Chiahalam
    Okere, Richard Anayo
    Ukwuaba, Sunday Ifeanyi
    Onyekuru, Anthony NwaJesus
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (18) : 5549 - 5558
  • [38] The effects of land management (grazing intensity) vs. the effects of topography, soil properties, vegetation type, and climate on soil carbon concentration in Southern Patagonia
    Peri, P. L.
    Ladd, B.
    Lasagno, R. G.
    Martinez Pastur, G.
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2016, 134 : 73 - 78
  • [39] The human dimensions of water saving irrigation: lessons learned from Chinese smallholder farmers
    Burnham, Morey
    Ma, Zhao
    Zhu, Delan
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2015, 32 (02) : 347 - 360
  • [40] Forage species and summer management impacts on soil carbon and nitrogen in winter stockpiled grazing systems
    Tilhou, Neal Wepking
    Nave, Renata L. G.
    Jagadamma, Sindhu
    Eash, Neal
    Mulliniks, J. Travis
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 4 (01)