Evaluation of Humidity Sensor Calibration Uncertainty by Monte Carlo Method

被引:0
作者
Wei, M. [1 ]
Wen, C. [2 ]
Li, C. [1 ]
Miao, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Meteorol Detect Ctr, Jiangxi Meteorol Bur, Nanchang 330096, Peoples R China
[2] Meteorol Informat Ctr, Jiangxi Meteorol Bur, Nanchang 330036, Peoples R China
来源
MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA | 2024年 / 39卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Humidity sensor; Calibration results; Uncertainty; GUM; MCM; Adaptive MCM; RELATIVE-HUMIDITY; DEW-POINT; GUM;
D O I
10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
To effectively solve the problem that the measurement uncertainty evaluation result is not accurate and the calculation is complicated when the humidity measuring instrument is calibrated. The "Monte Carlo simulation method" (MCM) was proposed to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of humidity sensor calibration results. In this process, firstly, by analyzing the calibration process of humidity sensor, the measurement model that can accurately and completely reflect the actual measurement situation is constructed; then, design a performance testing method for the humidity generator to obtain parameter data that can truly reflect the performance of the current humidity generator; finally, taking the 55%RH calibration point as an example, by using the above measurement model and related parameters, single MCM method and adaptive MCM method were used to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor calibration results. The evaluation results obtained are the same as: the best estimated value of humidity sensor measurement error Delta H = 0.01%RH, the standard uncertainty u(Delta H) = 0.14%RH, and the shortest coverage interval [Delta Hlow, Delta Hhigh] = [- 0.24%RH, 0.26%RH] when the coverage probability is 95%. Through this application experiment on the MCM method, it was found that compared to the GUM method, the MCM method can effectively improve the credibility of the measurement uncertainty results of the humidity sensor. Moreover, when the adaptive MCM method is applied to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor, compared to the single MCM method, it can effectively reduce simulation times, reduce storage space resources, and improve evaluation efficiency. Prioritizing the adaptive MCM method in practical operation is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 635
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Testing the reliability of humidity generator through measurements traceable to calibration standards [J].
Abd El-Galil, Doaa Mohamed ;
Mahmoud, Essam .
MEASUREMENT, 2018, 124 :159-162
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), V100
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 922008 QXT
[4]   Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty of perspiration measurement systems [J].
Chen, Andrew ;
Chen, Chiachung .
MEASUREMENT, 2016, 87 :27-37
[5]   Uncertainty measure in evidence theory [J].
Deng, Yong .
SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 63 (11)
[6]   Defining relative humidity in terms of water activity. Part 1: definition [J].
Feistel, Rainer ;
Lovell-Smith, Jeremy W. .
METROLOGIA, 2017, 54 (04) :566-576
[7]   Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of dissolution tests by the ISO-GUM approach and Monte-Carlo simulation [J].
Haidara, Hasnaa ;
Saffaj, Taoufiq ;
Bentama, Abdeslam ;
EL HajjI, Ridouane ;
Ihssane, Bouchaib .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2021, 64 (09) :4955-4971
[8]   Uncertainty Evaluation of the New Setup for Measurement of Water-Vapor Permeation Rate by a Dew-Point Sensor [J].
Hudoklin, D. ;
Setina, J. ;
Drnovsek, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS, 2012, 33 (8-9) :1595-1605
[9]  
JJG, JJG8261993
[10]   Identification of the Transient Response of a Capacitive Relative Humidity Sensor [J].
Kaplya, V., I ;
Kaplya, E., V ;
Silaev, A. A. .
MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 62 (12) :1099-1105