Classifying Crowdsourced Citizen Complaints through Data Mining: Accuracy Testing of k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and AdaBoost

被引:2
|
作者
Madyatmadja, Evaristus D. [1 ]
Sianipar, Corinthias P. M. [2 ,3 ]
Wijaya, Cristofer [1 ]
Sembiring, David J. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Bina Nusantara Univ, Informat Syst Dept, Jakarta 11530, Indonesia
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Global Ecol, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Div Environm Sci & Technol, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[4] Indonesian Inst Technol & Business ITBI, Deli Serdang 20374, Indonesia
来源
INFORMATICS-BASEL | 2023年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
public complaint; citizen science; crowdsourcing; sustainable city; machine learning; smart city; knowledge extraction; text mining; large language model; generative AI; E-GOVERNMENT; CLASSIFICATION; SVM; MANAGEMENT; ALGORITHM; CHINA; KNN;
D O I
10.3390/informatics10040084
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Crowdsourcing has gradually become an effective e-government process to gather citizen complaints over the implementation of various public services. In practice, the collected complaints form a massive dataset, making it difficult for government officers to analyze the big data effectively. It is consequently vital to use data mining algorithms to classify the citizen complaint data for efficient follow-up actions. However, different classification algorithms produce varied classification accuracies. Thus, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of several classification algorithms on crowdsourced citizen complaint data. Taking the case of the LAKSA app in Tangerang City, Indonesia, this study included k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and AdaBoost for the accuracy assessment. The data were taken from crowdsourced citizen complaints submitted to the LAKSA app, including those aggregated from official social media channels, from May 2021 to April 2022. The results showed SVM with a linear kernel as the most accurate among the assessed algorithms (89.2%). In contrast, AdaBoost (base learner: Decision Trees) produced the lowest accuracy. Still, the accuracy levels of all algorithms varied in parallel to the amount of training data available for the actual classification categories. Overall, the assessments on all algorithms indicated that their accuracies were insignificantly different, with an overall variation of 4.3%. The AdaBoost-based classification, in particular, showed its large dependence on the choice of base learners. Looking at the method and results, this study contributes to e-government, data mining, and big data discourses. This research recommends that governments continuously conduct supervised training of classification algorithms over their crowdsourced citizen complaints to seek the highest accuracy possible, paving the way for smart and sustainable governance.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithms for Classifying Heart Disease
    Lewandowicz, Bartosz
    Kisiala, Konrad
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, ICIST 2023, 2024, 1979 : 274 - 285
  • [2] A COMBINATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND k-NEAREST NEIGHBORS FOR MACHINE FAULT DETECTION
    Andre, Amaury B.
    Beltrame, Eduardo
    Wainer, Jacques
    APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 27 (01) : 36 - 49
  • [3] Data mining and social networks processing method based on support vector machine and k-nearest neighbor
    Lu, Youli
    Li, Jintong
    Yang, Zhihe
    Ou, Xianfeng
    Xie, Wenwu
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 21 (02) : 435 - 447
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbor Classifiers for Predicting Remaining Usage Life of Roller Bearings
    Palaniappan R.
    Informatica (Slovenia), 2024, 48 (07): : 39 - 52
  • [5] Distinct adoption of k-nearest neighbour and support vector machine in classifying EEG signals of mental tasks
    Mohanchandra, Kusuma
    Saha, Snehanshu
    Murthy, K. Srikanta
    Lingaraju, G. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2015, 3 (04) : 313 - 329
  • [6] Microscopic retinal blood vessels detection and segmentation using support vector machine and K-nearest neighbors
    Rehman, Amjad
    Harouni, Majid
    Karimi, Mohsen
    Saba, Tanzila
    Bahaj, Saeed Ali
    Awan, Mazar Javed
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2022, 85 (05) : 1899 - 1914
  • [7] Modeling Pan Evaporation Using Gaussian Process Regression K-Nearest Neighbors Random Forest and Support Vector Machines; Comparative Analysis
    Shabani, Sevda
    Samadianfard, Saeed
    Sattari, Mohammad Taghi
    Mosavi, Amir
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Kmet, Tibor
    Varkonyi-Koczy, Annamaria R.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [8] Heart Plaque Detection with Improved Accuracy using K-Nearest Neighbors classifier Algorithm in comparison with Least Squares Support Vector Machine
    Kumar, Vankamaddi Sunil
    Vidhya, K.
    CARDIOMETRY, 2022, (25): : 1590 - 1594
  • [9] Hybrid support vector machine and K-nearest neighbor-based software testing for educational assistant
    Ramesh, Lilly
    Radhika, S.
    Jothi, S.
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2023, 35 (01)
  • [10] Concrete Strength Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods CatBoost, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Regression
    Beskopylny, Alexey N.
    Stel'makh, Sergey A.
    Shcherban', Evgenii M.
    Mailyan, Levon R.
    Meskhi, Besarion
    Razveeva, Irina
    Chernil'nik, Andrei
    Beskopylny, Nikita
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (21):