Medical students' and residents' views on euthanasia

被引:2
作者
Dedivitis, Rogerio Aparecido [1 ]
de Matos, Leandro Luongo [2 ]
de Castro, Mario Augusto Ferrari [3 ,7 ]
de Castro, Andrea Anacleto Ferrari [3 ]
Giaxa, Renata Rocha [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Tempski, Patricia Zen [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Hosp Clin, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Inst Canc Estado Sao Paulo ICESP, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Metropolitana Santos, Santos, Brazil
[4] UNIFOR, Program Postgrad Med Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Hlth Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Desenvolvimento Ensino Med CEDEM, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Euthanasia; Assisted dying; Medical students; Medical end-of-life decisions; PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE; ATTITUDES; END; OPINIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00986-x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDoctors are increasingly faced with end-of-life decisions. Little is known about how medical students approach euthanasia. The objective of this study was to evaluate, among medical students and residents, the view on euthanasia and its variants; correlate such a view with empathy and religiosity/spiritualism; and with the stages of medical training in Brazil.MethodsThis is an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire to be filled out on a voluntary basis among medical students and residents, consisting of: socio-demographic data, an empathy questionnaire and questions with elaborate clinical cases that typify situations of the variants of euthanasia.ResultsFrom 1550 invitations, 273 volunteer participants responded (17.6%). The percentages of strong agreement/agreement on the concepts were: passive euthanasia (72.9%); active euthanasia (22.3%), orthothanasia (90.1%), dysthanasia (18.7%), assisted suicide (33%) and sedation (82.8%). Passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, dysthanasia and assisted suicide showed greater refusal with increasing length of medical training. Religious belief and degree of empathy did not significantly influence the opinion about the concepts. Strong agreement/agreement were: passive euthanasia (72.9%); active euthanasia (22.3%), orthothanasia (90.1%), dysthanasia (18.7%), assisted suicide (33%) and sedation (82.8%).ConclusionsPassive euthanasia, active euthanasia, dysthanasia and assisted suicide showed greater refusal with increasing length of medical training. The external validation of our findings relies on the distinct legal, cultural, and religious frameworks found across various countries.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   New Zealand medical students' views of euthanasia/assisted dying across different year levels [J].
Nie, Luke ;
Smith-Han, Kelby ;
Iosua, Ella ;
Walker, Simon .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
[22]   Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: psychometric properties and factor analysis [J].
Paro, Helena B. M. S. ;
Daud-Gallotti, Renata M. ;
Tiberio, Iolanda C. ;
Pinto, Rogerio M. C. ;
Martins, Milton A. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 12
[23]  
Pomfret Suzie, 2018, Future Healthc J, V5, P25, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-25
[24]  
Ramirez-Rivera Jose, 2006, P R Health Sci J, V25, P325
[25]  
Resolucao do Conselho Federal de Medicina, N 1931/2009, aprova o Codigo de Etica Medica, P173
[26]  
Reynolds Sharon, 2005, Thorac Surg Clin, V15, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.06.002
[27]  
Roberts LW, 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P1603
[28]  
Schioldborg P, 2000, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V120, P2283
[29]   A Comparison of the Willingness of Resident and Attending Physicians to Comply with the Requests of Patients at the End of Life [J].
Thomas, John M. ;
O'Leary, John R. ;
Fried, Terri R. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (07) :1048-1054
[30]   Uncertainty and opposition of medical students toward assisted death practices [J].
Warner, TD ;
Roberts, LW ;
Smithpeter, M ;
Rogers, M ;
Roberts, B ;
McCarty, T ;
Franchini, G ;
Geppert, C ;
Obenshain, SS .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 22 (02) :657-667