Growth promotion in maize (Zea mays L.) Bacillus strain CMAA 1363

被引:1
|
作者
Fuga, Cicero Augusto Guimaraes [1 ]
Caixeta, Guilherme Augusto Nunes [1 ]
Caixeta, Carla Ferreira [1 ]
de Melo, Itamar Soares [2 ]
机构
[1] Nooa Ciencia & Tecnol Agńcola Ltda, Patos De Minas, MG, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariuna, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS-AGRARIA | 2023年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
Azospirilum brasilense; biofertilizers; inoculant; seed treatment; ARYABHATTAI; TOLERANCE; STRESS;
D O I
10.5039/agraria.v18i3a3340
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of the bacterium Bacilus arayabhattai strain CMAA 1363 in promoting maize growth and productivity, comparing it with a commercial formulation of an inoculant based on Azospirillum brasilense Ab-V5 Ab-V6. To this end, in each of four different edaphoclimatic regions, a trial was conducted consisting of six treatments as follows: four doses of B. aryabhattai, a standard dose of A. brasilense, and an absolute control, with four repetitions, totaling 24 experimental plots. The parameters evaluated were seed germination, phytotoxicity, plant height, stalk diameter, dry mass of the aerial parts and roots, and yield. The results showed that B. aryabhattai was not phytotoxic, promoted the growth of maize plants, and increased productivity at a dose of 4 mL kg-1 in a statistically similar way to the standard commercial product. Therefore, it may constitute a new inoculant for maize crop.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of humic acid on the growth and cadmium accumulation of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings
    Song, Jun
    Pi, Boyi
    Dai, Jingtong
    Nie, Zhi
    Yu, Guirong
    Du, Wenping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION, 2025, : 888 - 895
  • [2] Brassinolide effects on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield under waterlogged conditions
    Otie, Victoria
    Ping, An
    Udo, Idorenyin
    Eneji, Egrinya
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2019, 42 (08) : 954 - 969
  • [3] Respiratory potential of maize (Zea mays L.) roots exposed to hypoxia
    Vodnik, D.
    Strajnar, P.
    Jemc, S.
    Macek, I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2009, 65 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [4] Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil
    Suriyaprabha, R.
    Karunakaran, G.
    Yuvakkumar, R.
    Prabu, P.
    Rajendran, V.
    Kannan, N.
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (12)
  • [5] Regulatory effect of graphene on growth and carbon/nitrogen metabolism of maize (Zea mays L.)
    Wang, Shiya
    Wang, Xinyi
    Liu, Ying
    Sun, Guangxu
    Kong, Deyong
    Guo, Wei
    Sun, Haiyan
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2024, 104 (03) : 1572 - 1582
  • [6] Photosynthesis and growth response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids exposed to cadmium stress
    Akhtar, Tasneem
    Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad
    Naeem, Asif
    Nawaz, Rab
    Ali, Shafaqat
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Maqsood, Muhammad Aamer
    Azhar, Muhammad
    Khalid, Hinnan
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (06) : 5521 - 5529
  • [7] Co-inoculation of Bacillus velezensis and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains improves growth and salinity tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.)
    Ercole, Tairine Graziella
    Kava, Vanessa Merlo
    Aluizio, Rodrigo
    Pauletti, Volnei
    Hungria, Mariangela
    Galli-Terasawa, Lygia Vitoria
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2023, 27
  • [8] Early response to salt ions in maize (Zea mays L.)
    Geilfus, Christoph-Martin
    Ludwig-Mueller, Jutta
    Bardos, Gyoengyi
    Zoerb, Christian
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 220 : 173 - 180
  • [9] Silicon and cadmium interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) plants cultivated in vitro
    Lukacova, Zuzana
    Liska, Denis
    Bokor, Boris
    Svubova, Renata
    Lux, Alexander
    BIOLOGIA, 2021, 76 (09) : 2721 - 2733
  • [10] Response of sweet maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to halosulfuron
    Sikkema, Sarah R.
    Soltani, Nader
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2008, 27 (3-5) : 695 - 699