Less is more? One-stage versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

被引:3
作者
van der Wielen, Alexander [1 ]
Negenborn, Vera [1 ]
Burchell, George Louis [2 ]
Remmelzwaal, Sharon [3 ]
Lapid, Oren [1 ]
Driessen, Caroline [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Med Lib, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Epidemiol & Data Sci, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Breast reconstruction; One-stage breast reconstruction; Two-stage breast reconstruction; Breast implant; Tissue expander; Comparison study; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; DIRECT-TO-IMPLANT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; IMMEDIATE; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most breast reconstructions are implant-based and can be performed either in a one-stage, direct-to-implant or in a two-stage, expander-implant-based re- construction. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the safety and patient satisfaction of the two reconstruction approaches.Methods: A literature search was conducted on 27 September 2022 using various databases. Studies comparing one-stage and two-stage implant reconstructions and reporting the following outcomes were included: patient satisfaction, aesthetics, complications, and/or costs. Reviews, case reports, or series with less than 20 patients and letters or comments were excluded. Comparisons were made between the one-stage reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction groups. The data extracted from all articles were analysed using random-effects meta-analyses.Results: Of the 1381 records identified, a total of 33 articles were included, representing 21529 patients. There were no significant differences between the one-stage and two-stage groups, except for the costs. The one-stage operation without ADM had lower costs than the two-stage operation without ADM, although the use of an ADM substantially increased the price of the operation to more than a two-stage reconstruction.Discussion: Equal patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes, and complication rates with lower costs justify one-stage breast reconstruction in carefully selected patients. This review shows that there is no evidence-based superior surgical approach. Future research should focus on the costs of the ADM versus an additional stage and patient-reported outcomes.(c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 127
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction [J].
Aliotta, Rachel E. ;
Duraes, Eliana F. R. ;
Scomacao, Isis ;
Morisada, Megan ;
Orra, Susan ;
Moreira, Andrea ;
Bernard, Steven ;
Schwarz, Graham ;
Djohan, Risal .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06) :1229-1238
[2]   How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial [J].
Balduzzi, Sara ;
Ruecker, Gerta ;
Schwarzer, Guido .
EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (04) :153-160
[3]   Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data [J].
Becherer, Babette E. ;
Heeg, Erik A. ;
Young-Afat, Danny A. ;
Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken ;
Rakhorst, Hinne A. ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (04) :693-702
[4]   Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction [J].
Bennett, Katelyn G. ;
Qi, Ji ;
Kim, Hyungjin M. ;
Hamill, Jennifer B. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (10) :901-908
[5]   Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study [J].
Brunbjerg, Mette Eline ;
Jensen, Thomas Bo ;
Overgaard, Jens ;
Christiansen, Peer ;
Damsgaard, Tine Engberg .
GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) :207-218
[6]   Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared with Tissue-expander Breast Reconstruction: Rate of Infection [J].
Carminati, Marcello ;
Sempf, Darja ;
Bonfirraro, Pier Paolo ;
Devalle, Luca ;
Verga, Maurizio ;
Righi, Bernardo ;
Mevio, Gabriele ;
Leone, Francesco ;
Fenaroli, Privato ;
Robotti, Enrico .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (12)
[7]   A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients [J].
Casella, D. ;
Di Taranto, G. ;
Onesti, Mg ;
Greco, M. ;
Ribuffo, D. .
EJSO, 2019, 45 (08) :1357-1363
[8]   Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evolution of the Conceptual and Technical Approach over a Two-Decade Period [J].
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Jazayeri, Leila .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (01) :1-11
[9]   Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: A comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps [J].
Damen, T. H. C. ;
Wei, W. ;
Mureau, M. A. M. ;
Tjong-Joe-Wai, R. ;
Hofer, S. O. P. ;
Essink-Bot, M. L. ;
Hovius, S. E. R. ;
Polinder, S. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (08) :1043-1053
[10]   Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: A multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications [J].
Davila, Armando A. ;
Mioton, Lauren M. ;
Chow, Geoffrey ;
Wang, Edward ;
Merkow, Ryan P. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Fine, Neil ;
Kim, John Y. S. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2013, 47 (05) :344-349