Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates

被引:3
|
作者
Olt, Caroline K. [1 ]
Thuita, Lucy W. [2 ]
Soltesz, Edward G. [3 ,4 ]
Tong, Michael Z. [3 ,4 ]
Weiss, Aaron J. [3 ]
Kendall, Kay
Estep, Jerry D. [3 ,4 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hsich, Eileen M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Heart & Vasc Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Transplant Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
hospital readmissions; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome assessment; SIPAT; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SOCIETY; SIPAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to deter-mine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, trans-plantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results: There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplan-tation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmis-sions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Trans-plant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Inte-grated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 +/- standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 +/- 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncar-diac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 +/- 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 +/- 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living envi-ronment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 +/- 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 +/- 0.21, P = .006). onclusions: Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychoso-cial tool. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1111-21)
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Varshney, Anubodh S.
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Cowger, Jennifer A.
    Netuka, Ivan
    Pinney, Sean P.
    Givertz, Michael M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (11) : 1092 - 1107
  • [32] Outcomes of Repeat Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange
    Chou, Brendan P.
    Lamba, Harveen K.
    Cheema, Faisal H.
    Civitello, Andrew B.
    Delgado, Reynolds M.
    Simpson, Leo
    Nair, Ajith P.
    Oberton, Selby
    Taimeh, Ziad A.
    Rosengart, Todd K.
    Frazier, O. H.
    Morgan, Jeffrey A.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [33] Prediction of hemodynamics under left ventricular assist device
    Kakino, Takamori
    Saku, Keita
    Sakamoto, Takafumi
    Sakamoto, Kazuo
    Akashi, Takuya
    Ikeda, Masataka
    Ide, Tomomi
    Kishi, Takuya
    Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
    Sunagawa, Kenji
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 312 (01): : H80 - H88
  • [34] Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes
    Smith, LaVone A.
    Yarboro, Leora T.
    Kennedy, Jamie L. W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2088 - 2096
  • [35] Left Ventricular Assist Device Emergencies Diagnosis and Management
    Sennhauser, Susie
    Sridharan, Lakshmi
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2024, 40 (01) : 159 - 177
  • [36] Noncardiac surgery in patients with a left ventricular assist device
    Puri, Archana
    Tobin, Raj
    Bhattacharjee, Shameek
    Kapoor, Mukul Chandra
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2020, 28 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [37] Left Ventricular Assist Device: Indications, Management, and Complications
    Hamdan, A.
    Ortuno, S.
    Guerot, E.
    Aissaoui, N.
    MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION, 2019, 28 (02): : 96 - 102
  • [38] Left Ventricular Assist Device Indication, Timing, and Management
    Frigerio, Maria
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2021, 17 (04) : 619 - 634
  • [39] Left Ventricular Assist Device Management in the Emergency Department
    Trinquero, Paul
    Pirotte, Andrew
    Gallagher, Lauren P.
    Iwaki, Kimberly M.
    Beach, Christopher
    Wilcox, Jane E.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 834 - 841
  • [40] Psychosocial characteristics and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist device implanted as destination therapy
    Snipelisky, David
    Stulak, John M.
    Schettle, Sarah D.
    Sharma, Shashank
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (05) : 887 - 894