Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates

被引:2
|
作者
Olt, Caroline K. [1 ]
Thuita, Lucy W. [2 ]
Soltesz, Edward G. [3 ,4 ]
Tong, Michael Z. [3 ,4 ]
Weiss, Aaron J. [3 ]
Kendall, Kay
Estep, Jerry D. [3 ,4 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hsich, Eileen M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Heart & Vasc Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Transplant Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2023年 / 165卷 / 03期
关键词
hospital readmissions; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome assessment; SIPAT; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SOCIETY; SIPAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to deter-mine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, trans-plantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results: There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplan-tation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmis-sions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Trans-plant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Inte-grated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 +/- standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 +/- 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncar-diac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 +/- 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 +/- 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living envi-ronment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 +/- 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 +/- 0.21, P = .006). onclusions: Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychoso-cial tool. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1111-21)
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Halkar, Meghana
    Nowacki, Amy S.
    Kendall, Kay
    Efeovbokhan, Nephertiti
    Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
    Moazami, Nader
    Starling, Randall C.
    Young, James B.
    Lee, Sangjin
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 28 (03) : 220 - 225
  • [2] Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidates
    Hayek, Salim
    Sims, Daniel B.
    Markham, David W.
    Butler, Javed
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 7 (02) : 379 - 389
  • [3] Medical Management of Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device for the Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Specialist
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Patel, Priyesh A.
    Patel, Chetan B.
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2017, 5 (09) : 621 - 631
  • [4] Left Ventricular Assist Device-Related Complications
    Clement, Alexandra
    Anghel, Larisa
    Sascau, Radu
    Statescu, Cristian
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR EMERGENCIES, 2020, 6 (03): : 50 - 58
  • [5] Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?
    Sciaccaluga, Carlotta
    Procopio, Maria Cristina
    Potena, Luciano
    Masetti, Marco
    Bernazzali, Sonia
    Maccherini, Massimo
    Landra, Federico
    Righini, Francesca Maria
    Cameli, Matteo
    Valente, Serafina
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2024, 29 (02) : 559 - 569
  • [6] The effects of demographic, psychosocial, and socioeconomic characteristics on access to heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device
    Kelty, C. E.
    Dickinson, M. G.
    Fogarty, K. J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS: CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 17
  • [7] Impairments identified by comprehensive geriatric assessment in potential candidates for left ventricular assist device and heart transplantation
    Dautzenberg, Lauren
    van Laake, Linda W.
    Raijman, Renee C. M. A.
    Lefeber, Geert J.
    Knol, Wilma
    Oerlemans, Marish I. F.
    Ramjankhan, Faiz Z.
    Braithwaite, Susan A.
    Nagtegaal, Mieke D. J.
    Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H.
    Koek, Huiberdina L.
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2024, 50
  • [8] Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Index in Candidates for Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Uribarri, Aitor
    Rojas, Sebastian, V
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Dogan, Guenes
    Siemeni, Thierry
    Kaufeld, Tim
    Ius, Fabio
    Goecke, Tobias
    Rojas-Hernandez, Sara
    Warnecke, Gregor
    Bara, Christoph
    Avsar, Murat
    Haverich, Axel
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 72 (08): : 608 - 615
  • [9] Adverse events after left ventricular assist device implantation linked to psychosocial risk in women and men
    Maukel, Lisa-Marie
    Weidner, Gerdi
    Beyersmann, Jan
    Spaderna, Heike
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (11): : 1557 - 1568
  • [10] Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Breathett, Khadijah
    Donald, Elena M.
    Nakagawa, Shunichi
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Truby, Lauren K.
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Uriel, Nir
    Farr, Maryjane A.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (09) : E006910