Generic Medicinal Products in Immunosuppressive Therapy-Should It be a Challenge for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring?

被引:0
|
作者
Kocur, Arkadiusz [1 ]
Kunicki, Pawel K. [1 ]
Pawinski, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Fac Pharm, Dept Drug Chem, Banacha 1, PL-02097 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
generics; bioequivalence; immunosuppressants; TDM; 2 ORAL FORMULATIONS; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL FORMULATIONS; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; FASTING CONDITIONS; OPEN-LABEL; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; TACROLIMUS FORMULATION; ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-SEQUENCE; BIOEQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1097/FTD.0000000000001041
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Immunosuppressants have a narrow therapeutic index (NTIDs). Indisputably cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus, and sirolimus have NTIDs, and only in the case of mycophenolic acid, a scientific discussion has not been yet concluded. Their specificities highlight the implications for generics introduced into the drug market, more precisely, with bioequivalence testing. In the European Union, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released the "Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence." The bioequivalence (BE) of the generic (tested, T) versus original (reference, R) product should be confirmed by obtaining a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the T:R ratio of each of the 2 decisive pharmacokinetic parameters, namely, the area under the curve (AUC) between 90.00% and 111.11%. A similar approach (90.00%-112.00%) for AUC was adopted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) for NTIDs; however, the US Food and Drug Administration is still based on classic acceptance criteria: 90% CI between 80.00% and 125.00% but with special requirements of BE testing. A discussion about long-expected global consensus was performed in this study based on the literature concerning BE testing in the case of NTIDs. The narrow acceptance criteria reduce the potential mean difference in bioavailability between generic and original products by a few percent. To identify this problem, special attention has been paid to switching drugs (generic-generic, original-generic) and therapeutic drug monitoring after conversion (TDM). There is no global consensus on the acceptance criteria for the BE of generic drugs; therefore, consensus and harmonization are strictly necessary. This study presents a review of the generic drug market and its classification by manufacturers, drug agencies, and dates of marketing authorization. Guidelines for TDM optimization (during switching/conversion) have been proposed. Physicians and clinical pharmacists should pay special attention to switching immunosuppressive drugs between original versus generic formulations, and generic versus generic formulations. Patients and their families should be educated on the risks associated with uncontrolled conversion.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 190
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in hepatology and gastroenterology
    Udomkarnjananun, Suwasin
    Francke, Marith, I
    De Winter, Brenda C. M.
    Mulder, Midas B.
    Baan, Carla C.
    Metselaar, Herold J.
    den Hoed, Caroline M.
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 54-55
  • [2] The Comparison of Brand-Name and Generic Formulations of Venlafaxine: A Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Analysis
    Unterecker, Stefan
    Proft, Florian
    Riederer, Peter
    Lauer, Martin
    Deckert, Juergen
    Pfuhlmann, Bruno
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2014, 36 (02) : 269 - 272
  • [3] Therapeutic-driven framework for bioequivalence assessment of complex topical generic drug products
    Lourenco, Diogo
    Miranda, Margarida
    Sousa, Joa Jose
    Vitorino, Carla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2024, 661
  • [4] Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs: Analytical and clinical practices
    Seyfinejad, Behrouz
    Jouyban, Abolghasem
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 205
  • [5] The compelling case for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil therapy
    Filler, Guido
    Catalina Alvarez-Elias, Ana
    McIntyre, Christopher
    Medeiros, Mara
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [6] Impact of Laboratory Practices on Interlaboratory Variability in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressive Drugs
    Christians, Uwe
    Vinks, Alexander A.
    Langman, Loralie J.
    Clarke, William
    Wallemacq, Pierre
    van Gelder, Teun
    Renjen, Varun
    Marquet, Pierre
    Meyer, Eric J.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2015, 37 (06) : 718 - 724
  • [7] Alternative matrices for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents using LC-MS/MS
    Ghareeb, Mwlod
    Akhlaghi, Fatemeh
    BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (08) : 1037 - 1058
  • [8] Pharmacogenetic testing and therapeutic drug monitoring are complementary tools for optimal individualization of drug therapy
    Gervasini, Guillermo
    Benitez, Julio
    Antonio Carrillo, Juan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (08) : 755 - 774
  • [9] Assuring the Proper Analytical Performance of Measurement Procedures for Immunosuppressive Drug Concentrations in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Immunosuppressive Drug Scientific Committee
    Seger, Christoph
    Shipkova, Maria
    Christians, Uwe
    Billaud, Elaine M.
    Wang, Ping
    Holt, David W.
    Brunet, Merce
    Kunicki, Pawel K.
    Pawinski, Thomasz
    Langman, Loralie J.
    Marquet, Pierre
    Oellerich, Michael
    Wieland, Eberhard
    Wallemacq, Pierre
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2016, 38 (02) : 170 - 189
  • [10] Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Liao, Dehua
    Shangguan, Dangang
    Yao, Dunwu
    Zhu, Qing
    Cao, Lizhi
    Long, Minghui
    Wu, Yi
    Xiang, Daxiong
    Yang, Nong
    PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS, 2018, 25 (06) : 528 - 533