Adoption of additive manufacturing: A survey of the role of knowledge networks and maturity in small and medium-sized Danish production firms

被引:8
作者
Haug, Anders [1 ]
Wickstrom, Kent Adsboll [1 ]
Stentoft, Jan [1 ]
Philipsen, Kristian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Entrepreneurship & Relationship Management, Univ Pk 1, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Maturity; Knowledge networks; Industry; 4; 0; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Survey; INDUSTRY; 4.0; TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; ALIGNMENT; BUSINESS; SMES; RECOMMENDATIONS; FLEXIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; CAPABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108714
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) has had a significant impact on manufacturing processes in many industries, which is expected to increase much further in the coming years. AM is, however, not easy to implement, as this involves several knowledge-related challenges, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). To add to the understanding of this phenomenon, we develop a theoretical model that describes the use of external networks for overcoming such challenges in part by acquiring AM knowledge to increase internal AM maturity. We test our model of direct and mediated network effects on AM-related competitive advantages through a survey of Danish manufacturing SMEs. The results show that increased AM maturity explains around 40 percent of the relationship between knowledge acquisition from networks and AM-related competitive advantages. Results also show that building internal AM maturity was especially driven by networking with AM developers, AM suppliers, and AM organizations, while networking with AM consultants and other AM users promoted competitive advantages through other mechanisms. This suggests two overall strategies for achieving competitive advantages from AM: (1) using networks to build AM maturity, and (2) using external AM resources to compensate for low internal AM maturity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]   A comparative evaluation of manufacturing flexibility adoption in SMEs and large firms in India [J].
Mishra, Ruchi .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (05) :730-762
[42]   A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [J].
Mittal, Sameer ;
Khan, Muztoba Ahmad ;
Romero, David ;
Wuest, Thorsten .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 49 :194-214
[43]   Expert humans or expert organizations? [J].
Mueller, F ;
Dyerson, R .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1999, 20 (02) :225-256
[44]   Pursuing successful rapid manufacturing: a users' best-practices approach [J].
Munguia, Javier ;
de Ciurana, Joaquim ;
Riba, Carles .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (03) :173-179
[45]  
Muthn L. K., 1998, MPLUS USERS GUIDE
[46]   Impact of additive manufacturing on business competitiveness: a multiple case study [J].
Niaki, Mojtaba Khorram ;
Nonino, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (01) :56-74
[47]  
OECD, 2017, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY, DOI 10.1787/9789264268821-en
[48]  
Oettmeier K., 2017, J BUS ECON STAT, V87, P97, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11573-016-0806-8
[49]   The state of the responsible research and innovation programme A case for its application in additive manufacturing [J].
Ogoh, George Inyila ;
Ben Fairweather, N. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 17 (02) :145-166
[50]   Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It [J].
Podsakoff, Philip M. ;
MacKenzie, Scott B. ;
Podsakoff, Nathan P. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :539-569