Contested fields of equality, diversity and inclusion at work: an institutional work lens on power relations and actors' strategies in Germany and Turkey

被引:11
作者
Kornau, Angela [1 ]
Knappert, Lena [2 ]
Tatli, Ahu [3 ]
Sieben, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Armed Forces Hamburg, Helmut Schmidt Univ, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Queen Mary Univ London, London, England
关键词
Equality; diversity; inclusion; institutional work; institutional actors; national context; power; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; GENDER EQUALITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL REGULATION; EXPERIENCES; DISCOURSES; FRANCE; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; DISCRIMINATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2022.2086014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore how institutional actors push or resist equality, diversity and inclusion in light of power relations in their respective country contexts. We conducted interviews with a range of institutional actors, including governmental organizations, employer representatives, unions, professional associations, and civil society organizations working on EDI issues in Germany and Turkey, two countries with very different socioeconomic and political settings. Our findings suggest that EDI fields are structured by country-specific power relations: they appear as competitively dispersed in Germany and politically polarized in Turkey, depending on the social position of the actors and the type of field fragmentation. These field characteristics, in turn, nurture different patterns of actors' strategies such as framing and mobilizing aimed at maintaining or disrupting the institutionalized status quo of EDI. We propose that a critical, power-sensitive institutional work approach to EDI is a useful lens through which to examine extra-organizational country contexts in international HRM research and, in particular, context-sensitive studies of EDI. As a practical implication, EDI and HR managers will be sensitized to the relevance of building coalitions with external stakeholders if they are to advance EDI within their organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2515
页数:35
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Inequality regimes - Gender, class, and race in organizations
    Acker, Joan
    [J]. GENDER & SOCIETY, 2006, 20 (04) : 441 - 464
  • [2] Hidden contexts and invisible power relations: A Foucauldian reading of diversity research
    Ahonen, Pasi
    Tienari, Janne
    Merilainen, Susan
    Pullen, Alison
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2014, 67 (03) : 263 - 286
  • [3] Understanding career experiences of skilled minority ethnic workers in France and Germany
    Al Ariss, Akram
    Vassilopoulou, Joana
    Oezbilgin, Mustafa F.
    Game, Annilee
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 24 (06) : 1236 - 1256
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Turkey 2018 Report
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, COMP PERSPECTIVES SO
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, GUARDIAN
  • [7] Battilana J, 2009, INSTITUTIONAL WORK: ACTORS AND AGENCY IN INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES OF ORGANIZATIONS, P31, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596605.002
  • [8] How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship
    Battilana, Julie
    Leca, Bernard
    Boxenbaum, Eva
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2009, 3 : 65 - 107
  • [9] Beer M., 1984, MANAGING HUMAN ASSET
  • [10] Changes in institutional context and MNC operations in China:: Subsidiary HRM practices in 1996 versus 2006
    Bjorkman, Ingmar
    Smale, Adam
    Sumelius, Jennie
    Suutari, Vesa
    Lu, Yuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2008, 17 (02) : 146 - 158