COVID-19: A multiwave SIR-based model for learning waves

被引:18
作者
Perakis, Georgia [1 ]
Singhvi, Divya [2 ]
Lami, Omar Skali [3 ]
Thayaparan, Leann [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA
[3] MIT, Operat Res Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
COVID-19; epidemiology modeling; SEIRD; wave modeling; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13681
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One of the greatest challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the way evolving regulation, information, and sentiment have driven waves of the disease. Traditional epidemiology models, such as the SIR model, are not equipped to handle these behavioral-based changes. We propose a novel multiwave susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model, which can detect and model the waves of the disease. We bring together the SIR model's compartmental structure with a change-point detection martingale process to identify new waves. We create a dynamic process where new waves can be flagged and learned in real time. We use this approach to extend the traditional susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-dead (SEIRD) model into a multiwave SEIRD model and test it on forecasting COVID-19 cases from the John Hopkins University data set for states in the United States. We find that compared to the traditional SEIRD model, the multiwave SEIRD model improves mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 15%-25% for the United States. We benchmark the multiwave SEIRD model against top performing Center for Disease Control (CDC) models for COVID-19 and find that the multiwave SERID model is able to outperform the majority of CDC models in long-term predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1471 / 1489
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Adams Ryan Prescott, 2007, Bayesian online changepoint detection
  • [2] Adams S, 2019, ANN ONCOL, V30, P405, DOI [10.1093/annonc/mdy518, 10.1093/annonc/mdy517]
  • [3] Adulyasak Y., 2020, DATA ANAL DETECT PAN
  • [4] Agca S., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 SUPP
  • [5] Allcott H., 2020, What explains temporal and geographic variation in the early US coronavirus pandemic? Technical report, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3610422
  • [6] A survey of methods for time series change point detection
    Aminikhanghahi, Samaneh
    Cook, Diane J.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 51 (02) : 339 - 367
  • [7] Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak
    Anastassopoulou, Cleo
    Russo, Lucia
    Tsakris, Athanasios
    Siettos, Constantinos
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, WHO naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it-11 March 2020
  • [9] Baek J., 2020, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
  • [10] From predictions to prescriptions: A data-driven response to COVID-19
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Boussioux, Leonard
    Cory-Wright, Ryan
    Delarue, Arthur
    Digalakis, Vassilis
    Jacquillat, Alexandre
    Kitane, Driss Lahlou
    Lukin, Galit
    Li, Michael
    Mingardi, Luca
    Nohadani, Omid
    Orfanoudaki, Agni
    Papalexopoulos, Theodore
    Paskov, Ivan
    Pauphilet, Jean
    Lami, Omar Skali
    Stellato, Bartolomeo
    Bouardi, Hamza Tazi
    Carballo, Kimberly Villalobos
    Wiberg, Holly
    Zeng, Cynthia
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 24 (02) : 253 - 272