Prognosis of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Mixed, Cardiogenic and Septic Shock

被引:6
作者
Kim, Ah-Ram [1 ]
Hyun, Junho [1 ]
Lee, Sang Eun [1 ]
Hong, Jung Ae [2 ]
Kang, Pil-Je [2 ]
Jung, Sung-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Min-Seok [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr Heart Inst, Heart Failure & Cardiac Transplantat Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43-gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
cardiogenic shock; septic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; coronary care units; critical care; LACTATE CLEARANCE; RISK-FACTORS; SEPSIS; MORTALITY; ECMO;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001933
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mixed cardiogenic-septic shock (MS), defined as the combination of cardiogenic (CS) and septic (SS) shock, is often encountered in cardiac intensive care units. Herein, the authors compared the impact of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in MS, CS, and SS. Of 1,023 patients who received VA-ECMO from January 2012 to February 2020 at a single center, 211 with pulmonary embolism, hypovolemic shock, aortic dissection, and unknown causes of shock were excluded. The remaining 812 patients were grouped based on the cause of shock at VA-ECMO application: i) MS (n = 246, 30.3%), ii) CS (n = 466, 57.4%), iii) SS (n = 100, 12.3%). The MS group was younger and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction than the CS or SS group did. The 30 day and 1 year mortalities were the highest in SS (30 day mortality: 50.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively; 1 year mortality: 67.5% vs. 53.2% vs. 81.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively). Posthoc analysis showed that the 30 day mortality of MS was not different from CS, while the 1 year mortality of MS was worse than CS but better than SS. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation application for MS may help improve survival and should therefore be considered if indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 664
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Microcirculation Evolution in Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
    Chommeloux, Juliette
    Montero, Santiago
    Franchineau, Guillaume
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Hekimian, Guillaume
    Lebreton, Guillaume
    Le Guennec, Loic
    Bourcier, Simon
    Nieszkowska, Ania
    Leprince, Pascal
    Luyt, Charles-Edouard
    Combes, Alain
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (01) : E9 - E17
  • [32] The Role of Palliative Care in Withdrawal of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock
    Godfrey, Sarah
    Sahoo, Aradhana
    Sanchez, Joseph
    Fried, Justin
    Masoumi, Amirali
    Brodie, Daniel
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Uriel, Nir
    Takeda, Koji
    Nakagawa, Shunichi
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (06) : 1139 - 1146
  • [33] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Septic Shock in Children
    Melnikov, Georgy
    Grabowski, Simon
    Broman, Lars Mikael
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (02) : 262 - 267
  • [34] Prevention and treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock
    Luesebrink, Enzo
    Orban, Mathias
    Kupka, Danny
    Scherer, Clemens
    Hagl, Christian
    Zimmer, Sebastian
    Luedike, Peter
    Thiele, Holger
    Westermann, Dirk
    Massberg, Steffen
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Orban, Martin
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (38) : 3753 - +
  • [35] Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Uricchio, Marissa N.
    Ramanan, Raj
    Esper, Stephen A.
    Murray, Holt
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    D'Aloiso, Brandon
    Gomez, Hernando
    Sciortino, Christopher
    Sanchez, Pablo G.
    Sappington, Penny L.
    Rivosecchi, Ryan M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2023, 69 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [36] Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality for Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Jeong, Joo Hee
    Kook, Hyungdon
    Lee, Seung Hun
    Joo, Hyung Joon
    Park, Jae Hyoung
    Hong, Soon Jun
    Kim, Mi-Na
    Park, Seong-Mi
    Jung, Jae Seung
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Jang, Woo Jin
    Kim, Hyun-Joong
    Bae, Jang-Whan
    Kwon, Sung Uk
    Lee, Wang Soo
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Park, Sang-Don
    Lim, Seong-Hoon
    Lee, Jiyoon
    Lee, Juneyoung
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (04):
  • [37] Cholesterol levels as a predictive marker for ICU survival in patients with cardiogenic shock supported by VenoArterial ExtraCorporeal membrane oxygenation
    de Haan, Maarten
    Bertjens, Etienne
    Kreeftenberg, Herman G.
    Soliman-Hamad, Mohamed A.
    Bezemer, Rick
    Bouwman, R. Arthur
    PERFUSION-UK, 2025,
  • [38] Sex differences in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Wang, Amy S.
    Nemeth, Samantha
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Brodie, Daniel
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Kaku, Yuji
    Fried, Justin
    Nir, Uriel
    Takeda, Koji
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 164 (03) : 960 - +
  • [39] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with septic shock
    Friedrichson, B.
    Fichte, J.
    Banjas, N.
    Schutz, M.
    Hopf, H-B
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2018, 59 : 698 - 704
  • [40] Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
    Verdugo, Fernando J.
    Cataldo, Pabla
    Sandoval, Jorge
    Pineda, Fernando
    Dauvergne, Christian
    Duarte, Manuel
    Bonta, Camila
    Iturra, Sebastian
    Olivares, Gabriel
    Concha, Marcelo
    Rossel, Victor
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2020, 148 (09) : 1295 - 1301