How do you measure trust in social institutions and health professionals? A systematic review of the literature (2012-2021)

被引:11
作者
Aboueid, Stephanie E. [1 ]
Herati, Hoda [1 ]
Nascimento, Maria H. G. [1 ]
Ward, Paul R. [2 ]
Brown, Patrick R. [3 ,4 ]
Calnan, Michael [5 ]
Perlman, Christopher M. [1 ]
Meyer, Samantha B. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Torrens Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth Equ & Human Flourishing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Sociol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Kent, Social Policy Sociol & Social Res, Canterbury, Kent, England
[6] 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS | 2023年 / 17卷 / 09期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
healthcare; index; institutions; measures; providers; scale; trust; validation; PUBLIC TRUST; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/soc4.13101
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The importance of measuring trust in health systems has been accentuated due to its correlation with important health outcomes aimed at reducing COVID-19 transmission. A systematic review published almost a decade ago identified gaps in measures including the lack of focus on trust in systems, inconsistency regarding the dimensionality of trust and need for research to strengthen the validity of measures. Given developments in our understandings of trust since its publication, we sought to identify new scales developed, existing ones adapted in response to identified gaps, and agendas for future research. Using the PRISMA approach for systematic reviews, we conducted a search in four databases. A total of 26 articles were assessed. Twelve new scales were identified, while 14 were adapted for different settings and populations. Literature continues to focus on measuring trust in health professionals rather than systems. Various shortcomings were identified, including some articles not mentioning the dimensions included in the scale and suboptimal use of validity and reliability testing and/or reporting. Moreover, a variety of terms were used for dimensions. Future research is needed to address these gaps and consequently, to understand their correlation with health behaviors and outcomes more accurately.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Luhmann N., 1988, TRUST MAKING BREAKIN, P94
[22]   Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic [J].
McHugh, Mary L. .
BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2012, 22 (03) :276-282
[23]   Trust in the health system: An analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann [J].
Meyer, Samantha ;
Ward, Paul ;
Coveney, John ;
Rogers, Wendy .
HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 17 (02) :177-186
[24]   Differentiating between trust and dependence of patients with coronary heart disease: furthering the sociology of trust [J].
Meyer, Samantha B. ;
Ward, Paul R. .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2013, 15 (03) :279-293
[25]   Trust In Governments And Health Workers Low Globally, Influencing Attitudes Toward Health Information, Vaccines [J].
Moucheraud, Corrina ;
Guo, Huiying ;
Macinko, James .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2021, 40 (08) :1215-1224
[26]  
Mouter N., 2020, EC STAT BERICHTEN, V105, P394
[27]  
Oksanen Atte, 2020, JMIR Public Health Surveill, V6, pe19218, DOI 10.2196/19218
[28]   How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature [J].
Ozawa, Sachiko ;
Sripad, Pooja .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 91 :10-14
[29]   Development and Validation of the Trust in My Doctor, Trust in Doctors in General, and Trust in the Health Care Team Scales [J].
Richmond, Jennifer ;
Boynton, Marcella H. ;
Ozawa, Sachiko ;
Muessig, Kathryn E. ;
Cykert, Samuel ;
Ribisl, Kurt M. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2022, 298
[30]   Treatment-seeking behaviour in urban Sri Lanka: Trusting the state, trusting private providers [J].
Russell, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (07) :1396-1407