Dynamic limit order placement activities and their effects on stock market quality

被引:1
作者
Le, Anh Tu [1 ,2 ]
Le, Thai-Ha [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Wai-Man [5 ]
Fong, Kingsley Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] PricewaterhouseCoopers PwC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Fulbright Univ Vietnam, Fulbright Sch Publ Policy & Management, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] IPAG Business Sch, Paris, France
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Dynamic limit order placement strategies; Stock market quality; Latency; SUBMISSION STRATEGIES; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-021-04282-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the interaction between dynamic limit order placement activities and market quality around the two system upgrades by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) which aims at reducing the latency of trades. We show that after the 2006 system upgrade from Stock Exchange Automated Trading System to Integrated Trading System, liquidity falls and short-term volatility heightens. Lower latency provides capacity for traders to position themselves to take liquidity when it is cheap. After the second upgrade in 2010 (launch of ASX Trade), the harmful effect reverses. Our evidence shows that in large-capitalisation stocks, algorithmic trading/high-frequency trading provides liquidity and stabilises the price when short-term volatility is high. Since we find that the market quality could be unfavourably affected after a system upgrade (i.e., the 2006 system upgrade), regulators need to be prepared for near-time reactions and rapid investigations in the event of market stress.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 175
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Limit orders, depth, and volatility: Evidence from the stock exchange of Hong Kong [J].
Ahn, HJ ;
Bae, KH ;
Chan, K .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (02) :767-788
[2]   Multiple duration analyses of dynamic limit order placement strategies and aggressiveness in a low-latency market environment [J].
Anh Tu Le ;
Thai-Ha Le ;
Liu, Wai-Man ;
Fong, Kingsley Y. .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 72
[3]   Order submission strategies, liquidity supply, and trading in pennies on the New York Stock Exchange [J].
Bacidore, J ;
Battalio, RH ;
Jennings, RH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2003, 6 (03) :337-362
[4]   Trading Fast and Slow: Colocation and Liquidity [J].
Brogaard, Jonathan ;
Hagstromer, Bjorn ;
Norden, Lars ;
Riordan, Ryan .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2015, 28 (12) :3407-3443
[5]   Undisclosed orders and optimal submission strategies in a limit order market [J].
Buti, Sabrina ;
Rindi, Barbara .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :797-812
[6]  
Cao Charles., 2008, J FINANC RES, V31, P113, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1475-6803.2008.00234.X
[7]   TRANSACTION COSTS, ORDER PLACEMENT STRATEGY, AND EXISTENCE OF THE BID-ASK SPREAD [J].
COHEN, KJ ;
MAIER, SF ;
SCHWARTZ, RA ;
WHITCOMB, DK .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1981, 89 (02) :287-305
[8]   Optimal order placement in limit order markets [J].
Cont, Rama ;
Kukanov, Arseniy .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2017, 17 (01) :21-39
[9]   Leveling the trading field [J].
Easley, David ;
Hendershott, Terrence ;
Ramadorai, Tarun .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2014, 17 :65-93
[10]   Limit order revisions [J].
Fong, Kingsley Y. L. ;
Liu, Wai-Man .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (08) :1873-1885