Bisection Constraint Method for Multiple-Loading Conditions in Structural Topology Optimization

被引:2
作者
Thi, Pham-Truong [1 ,2 ]
Kawamura, Yasumi [3 ]
Okada, Tetsuo [3 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Natl Univ, Grad Sch Engn Sci, 79-5 Tokiwadai,Hodogaya Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2408501, Japan
[2] Univ Danang, Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Transportat Mech Engn, 54 Nguyen Luong Bang, Danang 50608, Vietnam
[3] Yokohama Natl Univ, Fac Engn, 79-5 Tokiwadai,Hodogaya Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2408501, Japan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 24期
关键词
topology optimization; multiple-loading conditions; multi-objective optimization; min-max compliance; epsilon constraint; SIMP approach; LEVEL-SET METHOD; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PHASE-FIELD; DESIGN; SHAPE; CODE;
D O I
10.3390/app132413005
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Topology optimization (TO) is currently a focal point for researchers in the field of structural optimization, with most studies concentrating on single-loading conditions. However, real engineering structures often have to work under various loading conditions. Approaches addressing multiple-loading conditions often necessitate subjective input in order to determine the importance of each loading condition, aiming for a compromise between them. This paper proposes a so-called bisection constraint method (BCM), offering a unique, user-preference-independent solution for TO problems amidst multiple-loading conditions. It is well-known that minimizing the system's compliance is commonly used in TO as the objective. Generally, compliance is not as sufficient as stress to be used as a response to evaluate the performance of structures. However, formulations focusing on minimizing stress levels usually pose significant difficulties and instabilities. On the other hand, the compliance approach is generally simpler and more capable of providing relatively sturdy designs. Hence, the formulation of min-max compliance is used as the target problem formulation of the proposed method. This method attempts to minimize compliance under only one loading condition while compliances under the remaining loading conditions are constrained. During the optimization process, the optimization problem is automatically reformulated with a new objective function and a new set of constraint functions. The role of compliance under different loading conditions, i.e., whether it is to be treated as an objective or constraint function, might be changed throughout the optimization process until convergence. Several examples based on the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach were conducted to illustrate the validity of the proposed method. Furthermore, the general effectiveness of the compliance approach in terms of stress levels is also discussed. The calculation results demonstrated that while the compliance approach is effective in several cases, it proves ineffective in certain scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Multiple-load truss topology and sizing optimization: Some properties of minimax compliance [J].
Achtziger, W .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :255-280
[2]   A level-set method for shape optimization [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
COMPTES RENDUS MATHEMATIQUE, 2002, 334 (12) :1125-1130
[3]  
Allaire G., 1996, European Journal of Finite Elements, V5, P649, DOI [10.1080/12506559.1996.10511241, DOI 10.1080/12506559.1996.10511241]
[4]   Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code [J].
Andreassen, Erik ;
Clausen, Anders ;
Schevenels, Mattias ;
Lazarov, Boyan S. ;
Sigmund, Ole .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (01) :1-16
[5]   A phase-field-based graded-material topology optimization with stress constraint [J].
Auricchio, Ferdinando ;
Bonetti, Elena ;
Carraturo, Massimo ;
Hoemberg, Dietmar ;
Reali, Alessandro ;
Rocca, Elisabetta .
MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (08) :1461-1483
[6]  
Azegami H., 2020, SHAPE OPTIMIZATION P
[7]  
Bendsoe M., 2003, Topology Optimization, V2nd, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6]
[8]  
Bendsoe M.P., 1989, STRUCT OPTIMIZATION, V1, P193, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01650949
[9]   A VARIATIONAL FORMULATION FOR MULTICRITERIA STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
OLHOFF, N ;
TAYLOR, JE .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL MECHANICS, 1983, 11 (04) :523-544
[10]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224