Surrogate Model Development for Slope Stability Analysis Using Machine Learning

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Xianfeng [1 ,2 ]
Nishio, Mayuko [3 ]
Sugawara, Kentaro [4 ]
Iwanaga, Shoji [4 ]
Chun, Pang-jo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Engn Innovat, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Civil Engn, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Engn Informat & Syst, Dept Engn Mech & Energy, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
[4] Geosci Res Lab Co Ltd, 2-3-25 Koraku, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 1120004, Japan
关键词
slope stability; factor of safety; machine learning; surrogate model; LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM; REGRESSION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3390/su151410793
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many countries, slope failure is a complex natural issue that can result in serious natural hazards, such as landslide dams. It is associated with the challenge of slope stability evaluation, which involves the classification problem of slopes and the regression problem of predicting the factor of safety (FOS) value. This study explored the implementation of machine learning to analyze slope stability using a comprehensive database of 880 homogenous slopes (266 unstable and 614 stable) based on a simulation model developed as a surrogate model. A classification model was developed to categorize slopes into three classes, including S (stable, FOS > 1.2), M (marginally stable, 1.0 = FOS = 1.2), and U (unstable, FOS < 1.0), and a regression model was used to predict the target FOS value. The results confirmed the efficiency of the developed classification model via testing, achieving an accuracy of 0.9222, with 96.2% accuracy for the U class, 55% for the M class, and 95.2% for the S class. When U and M are in the same class (i.e., the U + M class), the test accuracy is 0.9315, with 93.3% accuracy for the S class and 92.9% accuracy for the U + M class. The low accuracy level for class M led to minor inaccuracies, which can be attributed to a data imbalance. Additionally, the regression model was found to have a high correlation coefficient R-square value of 0.9989 and a low test mean squared error value of 5.03 x 10(-4), which indicates a strong relationship between the FOS values and the selected slope parameters. The significant difference in the elapsed time between the traditional method and the developed surrogate model for slope stability analysis highlights the potential benefits of machine learning.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Slope Stability Analysis Using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method
    Fattahi, Hadi
    Ilghani, Nastaran Zandy
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 38 (03) : 2609 - 2618
  • [42] Determination of stability of slope using Minimax Probability Machine
    Samui, Pijush
    Hariharan, Rajadurai
    Karthikeyan, Jayaraman
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2014, 8 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [43] Machine learning classifier-based dynamic surrogate model for structural reliability analysis
    Su, Guoshao
    Sun, Weizhe
    Zhao, Ying
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2025, 21 (03) : 525 - 537
  • [44] Rock slope stability analysis and charts based on hybrid online sequential extreme learning machine model
    Deng, Chao
    Hu, Huanxiao
    Zhang, Tianle
    Chen, Jiale
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2020, 13 (03) : 729 - 746
  • [45] Stability prediction of a natural and man-made slope using various machine learning algorithms
    Karir, Dhruva
    Ray, Arunava
    Bharati, Ashutosh Kumar
    Chaturvedi, Utkarsh
    Rai, Rajesh
    Khandelwal, Manoj
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 34
  • [46] Slope stability analysis of heavy-haul freight corridor using novel machine learning approach
    Sabri, Md Shayan
    Ahmad, Furquan
    Samui, Pijush
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (01) : 201 - 219
  • [47] Analysis Grid Search Optimization of Machine Learning Models for Slope Stability Prediction Supports the Design Construction of Geotechnical Structures and Environmental Development
    Anuragi, Saurabh Kumar
    Kishan, D.
    METALLURGICAL & MATERIALS ENGINEERING, 2025, 31 (04) : 260 - 273
  • [48] Surrogate model of turbulent transport in fusion plasmas using machine learning
    Li, H.
    Wang, L.
    Fu, Y. L.
    Wang, Z. X.
    Wang, T. B.
    Li, J. Q.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2025, 65 (01)
  • [49] Adapting Data-Driven Techniques to Improve Surrogate Machine Learning Model Performance
    Jones, Huw Rhys
    Popescu, Andrei C.
    Sulehman, Yusuf
    Mu, Tingting
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 23909 - 23925
  • [50] Applying Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning to Slope Stability Prediction
    Pei, Te
    Qiu, Tong
    Shen, Chaopeng
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 149 (10)