Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature

被引:48
作者
de la Torre-Lopez, Jose [1 ]
Ramirez, Aurora [1 ]
Romero, Jose Raul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cordoba, Dept Comp Sci & Numer Anal, Rabanales Campus, Cordoba 14071, Spain
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Systematic literature review; Survey; WORKLOAD; CLASSIFICATION; SELECTION; QUESTION; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s00607-023-01181-x
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) has acquired notorious relevance in modern computing as it effectively solves complex tasks traditionally done by humans. AI provides methods to represent and infer knowledge, efficiently manipulate texts and learn from vast amount of data. These characteristics are applicable in many activities that human find laborious or repetitive, as is the case of the analysis of scientific literature. Manually preparing and writing a systematic literature review (SLR) takes considerable time and effort, since it requires planning a strategy, conducting the literature search and analysis, and reporting the findings. Depending on the area under study, the number of papers retrieved can be of hundreds or thousands, meaning that filtering those relevant ones and extracting the key information becomes a costly and error-prone process. However, some of the involved tasks are repetitive and, therefore, subject to automation by means of AI. In this paper, we present a survey of AI techniques proposed in the last 15 years to help researchers conduct systematic analyses of scientific literature. We describe the tasks currently supported, the types of algorithms applied, and available tools proposed in 34 primary studies. This survey also provides a historical perspective of the evolution of the field and the role that humans can play in an increasingly automated SLR process.
引用
收藏
页码:2171 / 2194
页数:24
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   The Concept of System for Automated Scientific Literature Reviews Generation [J].
Teslyuk, Anton .
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2020, PT III, 2020, 12139 :437-443
[42]   Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews [J].
Thomas, James ;
McDonald, Steve ;
Noel-Storr, Anna ;
Shemilt, Ian ;
Elliott, Julian ;
Mavergames, Chris ;
Marshall, Iain J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 133 :140-151
[43]   RevManHAL: towards automatic text generation in systematic reviews [J].
Torres, Mercedes Torres ;
Adams, Clive E. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[44]  
Tsafnat G, 2014, SYST REV-LONDON, V3, DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74
[45]   Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer [J].
Tsou, Amy Y. ;
Treadwell, Jonathan R. ;
Erinoff, Eileen ;
Schoelles, Karen .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
[46]   Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews [J].
van Altena, A. J. ;
Spijker, R. ;
Olabarriaga, S. D. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (01) :72-82
[47]   Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review [J].
van Dinter, Raymon ;
Tekinerdogan, Bedir ;
Catal, Cagatay .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 136
[48]  
WALLACE B. C., 2012, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT international health informatics symposium, V2, P819, DOI DOI 10.1145/2110363.2110464
[49]   FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers [J].
Yu, Zhe ;
Menzies, Tim .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 120 :57-71
[50]   Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews [J].
Yu, Zhe ;
Kraft, Nicholas A. ;
Menzies, Tim .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2018, 23 (06) :3161-3186