Undetected Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Yubo [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Cao, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Jiaxin [1 ,2 ]
Ping, Hangyu [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Xiangpeng [2 ,3 ]
Chai, Wei [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Sch Med, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Med Ctr 4, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Orthopaed, Sports Med & Rehabil, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Case Series; Femoral Stems; Fracture Lines; Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture; Risk Factors; FEMUR FRACTURE; RISK-FACTORS; PREVENTION; STEM;
D O I
10.1111/os.13646
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivePeriprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be catastrophic, and early detection and appropriate management are vital to the overall prognosis. This study aimed to describe and summarize the features of undetected intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFFs) in primary THA patients and treatment measures and to review the relevant literature. MethodsWe reviewed a total of 6350 primary THAs performed at our institution between January 2013 and December 2020 and screened all IPFFs. Of 138 IPFFs, 24 were undetected and met the inclusion criteria. We recorded and compared basic patient and operative information and measured some parameters to evaluate canal morphologies based on preoperative radiographs. We also compared fracture line characteristics using postoperative radiographs to summarize the features of intraoperative fractures and propose treatment strategies. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality of the variable distributions. Measured parameters in all groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and compared using Dunnett's test. The chi(2) and Fisher exact tests were used to compare reoperation rates across the groups. Interrater and intrarater reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients. ResultsAmong the 24 hips, there was no significant difference in patient demographics, basic operative information or morphology. The incidence of IPFFs in primary THA patients was 2.17%, and up to 17.4% of IPFFs were undetected until postoperative fluoroscopy. The incidence of undetected IPFFs among all primary THA patients was 0.38% and varied by stem type, with the highest incidence in femurs with either anatomical (1.04%, 4/385) or modular stems (0.90%, 9/1003). Femurs with anatomical stems had a higher reoperation rate. The distal periprosthetic (Gruen zone 4) fracture line of femurs with tapered stems was more prone to involve the medial or lateral bone cortex, which could cause instability. ConclusionAn undetected IPFF is most likely in femurs fitted with a prosthesis of an inappropriate size or type. Anatomical stems will most likely cause unstable fractures; thus, it is recommended to use them with caution and note the possibility of medial distal femoral fracture. Improper modular stem type or size selection results in longitudinal fractures of the distal femur, and prophylactic cerclage wire binding is recommended in dysplastic hips. Incorrect use of tapered stems in well-ossified femurs may cause distal femoral fractures involving the medial or lateral bone cortex. Intraoperative fluoroscopy after implantation may help detect hidden fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 765
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty - a review
    Rayan, Faizal
    Haddad, Fares
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 20 (04) : 418 - 426
  • [2] Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients with Hip Dysplasia Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Prostheses
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Si-Kai
    Wu, Tao
    Liu, Ze-Ming
    Chen, Xiao
    Li, Meng-Nan
    Li, Hui-Jie
    Han, Yong-Tai
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (06) : 1870 - 1881
  • [3] Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study
    Liu, Bo
    Ma, Wenhui
    Li, Huijie
    Wu, Tao
    Huo, Jia
    Han, Yongtai
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07): : 1400 - 1411
  • [4] PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A REVIEW OF LITERATURE
    Saccomanni, B.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 : S761 - S762
  • [5] A Review of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Marsland, Daniel
    Mears, Simon C.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2012, 3 (03) : 107 - 120
  • [6] Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty
    Ohly, Nicholas E.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (06) : 556 - 567
  • [7] Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Dauder-Gallego, Cristina
    Lopez-Hualda, Alvaro
    Ferreno-Marquez, David Manuel
    Sosa-Reina, Maria Dolores
    Villafane, Jorge Hugo
    Martinez-Martin, Javier
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2024, 40 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [8] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cottino, Umberto
    Mabry, Tad M.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 2005 - 2010
  • [9] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Matthew P. Abdel
    Umberto Cottino
    Tad M. Mabry
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 2005 - 2010
  • [10] Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
    Young, Simon W.
    Pandit, Salil
    Munro, Jacob T.
    Pitto, Rocco P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (06) : 424 - 428