Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hanada, Keisuke [1 ]
Sugimoto, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ, Grad Sch Data Sci, 1-1-1 Baba, Hikone, Shiga 5228522, Japan
关键词
Exact distribution; Meta-analysis; Random-effects model; Test statistic; HETEROGENEITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10463-022-00844-4
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Random-effects meta-analysis serves to integrate the results of multiple studies with methods such as moment estimation and likelihood estimation duly proposed. These existing methods are based on asymptotic normality with respect to the number of studies. However, the test and interval estimation deviate from the nominal significance level when integrating a small number of studies. Although a method for constructing more conservative intervals has been recently proposed, the exact distribution of test statistic for the overall treatment effect is not well known. In this paper, we provide an almost-exact distribution of the test statistic in random-effects meta-analysis and propose the test and interval estimation using the almost-exact distribution. Simulations demonstrate the accuracy of estimation and application to existing meta-analysis using the method proposed here. With known variance parameters, the estimation performance using the almost-exact distribution always achieves the nominal significance level regardless of the number of studies and heterogeneity. We also propose some methods to construct a conservative interval estimation, even when the variance parameters are unknown, and present their performances via simulation and an application to Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 302
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis
    Knapp, G
    Biggerstaff, BJ
    Hartung, J
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (02) : 271 - 285
  • [22] A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Spiegelhalter, David J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2009, 172 : 137 - 159
  • [23] Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis
    Hall, SM
    Brannick, MT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) : 377 - 389
  • [24] Heterogeneity and study size in random-effects meta-analysis
    Bowater, Russell J.
    Escarela, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 40 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [25] Comments on 'Sequential methods for random-effects meta-analysis'
    Imberger, Georgina
    Gluud, Christian
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (24) : 2965 - 2966
  • [26] Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Varin, Cristiano
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 1500 - 1518
  • [27] metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis
    Harris, Ross J.
    Bradburn, Michael J.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Harbord, Roger M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01): : 3 - 28
  • [28] Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change
    Cornell, John E.
    Mulrow, Cynthia D.
    Localio, Russell
    Stack, Catharine B.
    Meibohm, Anne R.
    Guallar, Eliseo
    Goodman, Steven N.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (04) : 267 - 270
  • [29] NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE PROCEDURE FOR PERCENTILES OF THE RANDOM EFFECTS DISTRIBUTION IN META-ANALYSIS
    Wang, Ru
    Tian, Lu
    Cai, Tianxi
    Wei, L. J.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2010, 4 (01): : 520 - 532
  • [30] Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random-effects meta-analysis in oncology
    Ren, Jinma
    Ma, Jia
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (02) : 326 - 331