AMMI Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield, Sugar Content and Production in Romania

被引：8

作者：

Oroian, Camelia ^{[1
]}

Ugrutan, Florin ^{[2
]}

Muresan, Iulia Cristina ^{[1
]}

Oroian, Ioan ^{[3
]}

Odagiu, Antonia ^{[3
]}

Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin ^{[3
]}

Burduhos, Petru ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Agr Sci & Vet Med Cluj Napoca, Dept Econ Sci, 3-5 Manastur St, Cluj Napoca 400372, Romania

[2] Corp Ludus, Premium Sugar Factory, 3-5 Fabricii St, Ludus 545200, Romania

[3] Univ Agr Sci & Vet Med Cluj Napoca, Dept Enviromental Engn & Protect, 3-5 Manastur St, Cluj Napoca 400372, Romania

来源：

AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期

关键词：

AMMI biplot; genotype; environment; sugar beet yield; sugar content; production; GGE-BIPLOT; STABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; SELECTION; QUALITY; WHEAT;

D O I：

10.3390/agronomy13102549

中图分类号：

S3 [农学（农艺学）];

学科分类号：

0901 ;

摘要：

The overall yield and sugar content of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) were determined by the genotype and its interaction with the environment. This study aimed to analyze the interaction of 23 genotypes with different environmental conditions during two growing seasons. To estimate the variance of genotypes, environment, and genotype function of the environment, the R 3.5.1 software package was used. In addition, the multivariate stability method was used to explain the G (genotype) x E (environment) interaction based on the GGE (Genotype plus Genotype-by-Environment) and AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) biplots. The AMMI ASV (AMMI stability value) and biplot analysis revealed that only two genotypes (G10 and G11) showed higher values for yield and sugar content and production compared to the other genotypes. The AMMI ASV analysis also showed that the environment significantly influenced the sugar beet yield, sugar content, and sugar production, which were the descriptors for production in this study.

引用

页数：13

共 50 条

[21] EVALUATION OF YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES (BETA VULGARIS L.) IN ERZURUM ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
Sefaoglu, Firat
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (06): : 4903 - 4908
[22] Mild salinity improves sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) quality
Hajiboland, Roghieh
Joudmand, Arshad
Fotouhi, Keivan
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2009, 59 (04) : 295 - 305
[23] EVALUATION OF YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES (BETA VULGARIS L.) IN ERZURUM ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
Sefaoglu, Firat
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (08): : 6140 - 6145
[24] Yield of bolting winter beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by plant density, genotype and environment
Reinsdorf, E.
Koch, H. -J.
Loel, J.
Hoffmann, C. M.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2014, 54 : 1 - 8
[25] Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yields and Potential for Bioethanol Production under Irrigation Regime
Barsan, Simona C.
Ivan, Ancuta M.
Luca, Laura C.
Luca, Emil
NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2015, 43 (02) : 455 - 461
[26] Selection for sugar yield in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, using different selection indices
Geidel, H
Weber, WE
Mechelke, W
Haufe, W
PLANT BREEDING, 2000, 119 (02) : 188 - 190
[27] Efficacy of Nanofertilizer, Fulvic Acid and Boron Fertilizer on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield and Quality
Kandil, Essam E.
Abdelsalam, Nader R.
Abd El Aziz, Ashraf A.
Ali, Hayssam M.
Siddiqui, Manzer H.
SUGAR TECH, 2020, 22 (05) : 782 - 791
[28] Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris l. subsp.vulgaris) production in Poland — Present status and future perspectives
Witold Grzebisz
Sugar Tech, 2004, 6 (4) : 201 - 206
[29] Weed control programs in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): Influence on herbicidal residue and yield quality
Wujek, Barbara
Kucharski, Mariusz
Domaradzki, Krzysztof
JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (3-4): : 606 - 609
[30] Efficacy of Nanofertilizer, Fulvic Acid and Boron Fertilizer on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield and Quality
Essam E. Kandil
Nader R. Abdelsalam
Ashraf A. Abd EL Aziz
Hayssam M. Ali
Manzer H. Siddiqui
Sugar Tech, 2020, 22 : 782 - 791

← 1 2 3 4 5 →