Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones

被引:2
作者
Meng, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Huajun [3 ]
Wang, Jiahao [2 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ]
Jiang, Zhaosheng [1 ]
Ma, Limin [1 ]
Guan, Yangbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Urol, Nantong 226001, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Wuxi Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Wuxi 214023, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Med Univ, Dalian 116000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy; Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Lower pole renal stones; Safety; Efficacy; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; KIDNEY-STONES; METAANALYSIS; CM; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-023-03771-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical information of patients with 1.5-2.5 cm lower pole renal stones treated by single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURS) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in affiliated hospital of the Nantong University from January 2020 to December 2022. To compare the safety and efficacy of single-use fURS and MPCNL in the treatment from 1.5cm to 2.5cm lower pole renal stones.Methods Clinical information of 141 patients were collected and divided into single-use fURS group and MPCNL group according to their treatment methods, including 83 patients in the single-use fURS group and 58 patients in the MPCNL group. Baseline data, data on the clinical characteristics of stones, laboratory examination data, operation time, and postoperative data of the two groups were collected. Statistical analysis was made on the collected data to analyze the differences and causes between the two groups of patients.Results There was no significant difference in the baseline data and preoperative clinical features of 141 patients between the two groups (P > 0.05). In comparison of postoperative serum indexes, the drop values of hemoglobin and creatinine in single-use fURS group were lower than those in MPCNL group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The stone free rate was higher in the MPCNL group than in the single-use fURS group on the first day after surgery. At the 1st month after surgery, the two groups were similar. At 3rd month after surgery, the single-use fURS group was slightly higher than the MPCNL group, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The total complication rate in single-use fURS group was slightly lower than that in MPCNL group, but there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Conclusions Single-use fURS has similar safety and efficacy to MPCNL in the treatment of 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones. Single-use fURS may be a new option for the treatment of these stones.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety
    Chen, Yeda
    Wen, Yaoan
    Yu, Qingfeng
    Duan, Xiaolu
    Wu, Wenqi
    Zeng, Guohua
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Danilovic A, 2020, INT BRAZ J UROL, V46, P273, DOI [10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.02.05, 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.02.05]
  • [3] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones &gt;1 cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Dorantes-Carrillo, Luis Alberto
    Basulto-Martinez, Mario
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Heinze, Alexander
    Proietti, Silvia
    Flores-Tapia, Juan Pablo
    Esqueda-Mendoza, Antonio
    Giusti, Guido
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (01): : 259 - 270
  • [4] PERCUTANEOUS PYELOLITHOTOMY - NEW EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE
    FERNSTROM, I
    JOHANSSON, B
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1976, 10 (03): : 257 - 259
  • [5] The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients
    Giulioni, Carlo
    Castellani, Daniele
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Chew, Ben Hall
    Tailly, Thomas
    Keat, William Ong Lay
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Emiliani, Esteban
    Chai, Chu Ann
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    Ragoori, Deepak
    Tanidir, Yiloren
    Hamri, Saeed Bin
    Gadzhiev, Nariman
    Traxer, Olivier
    Gauhar, Vineet
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (05) : 1407 - 1413
  • [6] Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
    Goger, Yunus Emre
    Ozkent, Mehmet Serkan
    Kilinc, Muzaffer Tansel
    Taskapu, Hakan Hakki
    Goger, Esra
    Aydin, Arif
    Sonmez, Mehmet Giray
    Karalezli, Giray
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (09) : 3643 - 3650
  • [7] Single-Use vs. Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope to Treat Upper Urinary Calculi: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis
    Huang, Fang
    Zhang, Xiaoqiong
    Cui, Yu
    Zhu, Zewu
    Li, Yongchao
    Chen, Jinbo
    Zeng, Feng
    Li, Yang
    Chen, Zhiyong
    Chen, Hequn
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 8
  • [8] Jinhua D, 2022, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V26, P3430, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_202205_28836
  • [9] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Ntasiotis, Panteleimon
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Adamou, Constantinos
    Emiliani, Esteban
    Knoll, Thomas
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Tailly, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (03) : 427 - 433
  • [10] Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Kyriazis, Iason
    Panagopoulos, Vasilios
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Ozsoy, Mehmet
    Vasilas, Marinos
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (08) : 1069 - 1077