The Choice of Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Targeted Drug Delivery in the Management of Chronic Pain: Validation of an Outcomes Predictive Formula

被引:0
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ,3 ]
Armanyous, Sherif [1 ]
Templeton, Erin [1 ]
Prayson, Nicholas [1 ]
Saweris, Youssef [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Sutter Gould Med Fdn, Modesto, CA USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, 9500 Euclid Ave,C-25, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2023年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Mekhail ' s predictive formula; neuromodulation; patient selection; spinal cord stimulation; targeted drug delivery; NEUROMODULATION DEVICES; THERAPY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2023.02.083
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: In 2020, Mekhail et al published a formula that predicted the likelihood of a successful outcome for those who undergo spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for long-term pain management, based on retrospectively collected clinical and demo-graphic data from one major medical center. The aim of this study is to validate such a predictive formula, prospectively, in a cohort of patients from multiple medical practices that are more representative of real-life clinical practice.Materials and Methods: For the study, 939 patients who underwent successful SCS or targeted drug delivery (TDD) trials at multiple independent medical centers in the USA were enrolled into the Medtronic product surveillance registry data base before they underwent SCS or TDD device implantation, from 2018 to 2020. The registry data were collected prospectively but not specifically for this study. The data examined included demographic information, pain diagnosis, pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), Oswestry Disability Index scores, and quality-of-life scores at baseline and six months after implant. Because our goal is to validate the previously published predictive formula, in addition to the outcomes data previously mentioned, we collected the variables necessary for such a task: sex, age, depression, the presence of neuropathic pain, spine-related pain diagnosis, and persistent spinal pain syndrome "post laminectomy syndrome." Spine-related pain diagnosis included subjects with chronic spine pain who never had back surgery and whose pain was not radicular nor neuropathic.Results: Of 619 patients with SCS, 138 (22%) achieved & GE; 50% reductions of the baseline VAS at six months. The logistic model predicts SCS success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 80% in the current validation data set. Of 320 patients with TDD, 147 (46%) achieved & GE; 50% reduction of the baseline VAS at six months. The logistic model predicts TDD success with an AUC of 78% in the current validation data set.Conclusion: The study provides real life validation of the previously published predictive formula(4).
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1225
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Management of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Complications
    Ratnayake, Chathura Bathiya
    Bunn, Amanda
    Pandanaboyana, Sanjay
    Windsor, John Albert
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [22] Early Experience With a Novel Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain of the Back and Legs
    Salmon, John
    Bates, Dan
    Du Toit, Neels
    Verrills, Paul
    Yu, James
    Taverner, Murray G.
    Mohabbati, Vahid
    Green, Matthew
    Heit, Gary
    Levy, Robert
    Staats, Peter
    Ruais, Jonathan
    Kottalgi, Shilpa
    Makous, James
    Mitchell, Bruce
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (01): : 172 - 181
  • [23] The Use of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Intrathecal Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Low Back-Related Pain
    Bagnall, David
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 21 (04) : 851 - +
  • [24] Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial
    North, RB
    Kidd, DH
    Farrokhi, F
    Piantadosi, SA
    NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 56 (01) : 98 - 106
  • [25] Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kumar, K
    Malik, S
    Demeria, D
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [26] The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy for Chronic Pain Management: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    John V. Prunskis
    Tadas Masys
    Stephen T. Pyles
    Alaa Abd-Elsayed
    Timothy R. Deer
    Douglas P. Beall
    Ramis Gheith
    Sheel Patel
    Dawood Sayed
    Hadi Moten
    Todd Hagle
    Chadi I. Yaacoub
    Leon Anijar
    Mayank Gupta
    Terri Dallas-Prunskis
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2025, 29 (1)
  • [27] Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation
    Sabourin, Shelby
    Tram, Justin
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [28] Health-Care Utilization and Outcomes with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Pain
    Gupta, Mayank
    Ray, Mahoua
    Ladesich, Nicole
    Gupta, Akshat
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3675 - 3683
  • [29] Electrical neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic pain: derivation of the intrinsic barriers, outcomes and considerations of the sustainability of implantable spinal cord stimulation therapies
    Malinowski, Mark N.
    Gish, Brandon E.
    Moreira, Alexandra M.
    Karcz, Marcin
    Bracero, Lucas A.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (08) : 741 - 753
  • [30] One-Year Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain
    Liem, Liong
    Russo, Marc
    Huygen, Frank J. P. M.
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Smet, Iris
    Verrills, Paul
    Cousins, Michael
    Brooker, Charles
    Levy, Robert
    Deer, Timothy
    Kramer, Jeffrey
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (01): : 41 - 49