The Choice of Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Targeted Drug Delivery in the Management of Chronic Pain: Validation of an Outcomes Predictive Formula

被引:0
|
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ,3 ]
Armanyous, Sherif [1 ]
Templeton, Erin [1 ]
Prayson, Nicholas [1 ]
Saweris, Youssef [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Sutter Gould Med Fdn, Modesto, CA USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, 9500 Euclid Ave,C-25, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2023年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Mekhail ' s predictive formula; neuromodulation; patient selection; spinal cord stimulation; targeted drug delivery; NEUROMODULATION DEVICES; THERAPY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2023.02.083
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: In 2020, Mekhail et al published a formula that predicted the likelihood of a successful outcome for those who undergo spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for long-term pain management, based on retrospectively collected clinical and demo-graphic data from one major medical center. The aim of this study is to validate such a predictive formula, prospectively, in a cohort of patients from multiple medical practices that are more representative of real-life clinical practice.Materials and Methods: For the study, 939 patients who underwent successful SCS or targeted drug delivery (TDD) trials at multiple independent medical centers in the USA were enrolled into the Medtronic product surveillance registry data base before they underwent SCS or TDD device implantation, from 2018 to 2020. The registry data were collected prospectively but not specifically for this study. The data examined included demographic information, pain diagnosis, pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), Oswestry Disability Index scores, and quality-of-life scores at baseline and six months after implant. Because our goal is to validate the previously published predictive formula, in addition to the outcomes data previously mentioned, we collected the variables necessary for such a task: sex, age, depression, the presence of neuropathic pain, spine-related pain diagnosis, and persistent spinal pain syndrome "post laminectomy syndrome." Spine-related pain diagnosis included subjects with chronic spine pain who never had back surgery and whose pain was not radicular nor neuropathic.Results: Of 619 patients with SCS, 138 (22%) achieved & GE; 50% reductions of the baseline VAS at six months. The logistic model predicts SCS success with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 80% in the current validation data set. Of 320 patients with TDD, 147 (46%) achieved & GE; 50% reduction of the baseline VAS at six months. The logistic model predicts TDD success with an AUC of 78% in the current validation data set.Conclusion: The study provides real life validation of the previously published predictive formula(4).
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1225
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Park, Yunseo Linda
    Hunter, Jared
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Khazen, Olga
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1357 - 1362
  • [2] Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management
    Barolat, G
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (03): : 258 - 262
  • [3] Management of Refractory Cancer Pain with Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Bulat, Evgeny
    Crowther, Jason E.
    Chakravarthy, Vikram
    Laufer, Ilya
    Barzilai, Ori
    Gulati, Amitabh
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 301 - 305
  • [4] Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain
    Mekhail, Nagy
    Costandi, Shrif
    Saweris, Youssef
    Armanyous, Sherif
    Chauhan, Gaurav
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (04) : 432 - 439
  • [5] Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain
    Fangfang Xing
    R. Jason Yong
    Alan David Kaye
    Richard D. Urman
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2018, 22
  • [6] Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain
    Xing, Fangfang
    Yong, R. Jason
    Kaye, Alan David
    Urman, Richard D.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2018, 22 (02)
  • [7] New advancements in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management
    Xu, Jijun
    Liu, Aijun
    Cheng, Jianguo
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (06) : 710 - 717
  • [8] Evolving Spinal Cord Stimulation Technologies and Clinical Implications in Chronic Pain Management
    Viswanath, Omar
    Urits, Ivan
    Bouley, Emily
    Peck, Jacquelin M.
    Thompson, William
    Kaye, Alan David
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2019, 23 (06)
  • [9] Cervical and cervicomedullary spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: Efficacy and outcomes
    Chivukula, Srinivas
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Weiner, Gregory M.
    Gande, Abhiram V.
    Chen, Ching-Jen
    Ding, Dale
    Moossy, John J.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 127 : 33 - 41
  • [10] Factors Contributing to Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain
    Graham, Dakota T.
    Lambert, Margaret
    Mirzadeh, Zaman
    Ponce, Francisco A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (01): : 145 - 154