Science for sale? Why academic marketization is a problem and what sustainability research can do about it

被引:9
作者
Bauwens, Thomas [1 ]
Reike, Denise [2 ,3 ]
Calisto-Friant, Martin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Dept Empresa, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Academic publishing; Commodification; Publish-or-perish; Sustainability; Transition studies; Circular economy; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; REVIEWERS; COMMODIFICATION; COMPETITION; FACULTY; PUBLISH; PERISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2023.100749
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scholars have long called out the flaws in academic publishing. However, a nuanced and constructive discussion of this issue is still lacking. We advocate that these flaws are symptoms of broader and intensifying marketization of academic research. To address this, we first discuss the two dimensions of marketization: the commodification of academic output and the 'managerialization' of academic governance. We then argue that sustainability research is especially vulnerable to marketization trends because of its broader set of values that cannot merely be reflected in academic output. We illustrate these values by discussing the nature of the challenges faced by sustainability researchers, their relationships with non-academic stakeholders, and the intrinsic normativity of their research. We explore potential ways forward to reform existing academic organizational structures and research funding system, embrace more inclusive and democratic research approaches, and support the development of nonprofit open-access journals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review [J].
Aczel, Balazs ;
Szaszi, Barnabas ;
Holcombe, Alex O. .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2021, 6 (01)
[2]   The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships [J].
Anderson, Melissa S. ;
Ronning, Emily A. ;
De Vries, Raymond ;
Martinson, Brian C. .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2007, 13 (04) :437-461
[3]   Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students [J].
Anderson, MS .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2000, 6 (04) :443-461
[4]  
Anderson MS, 1996, J INFORM ETHICS, V5, P15
[5]   Are the circular economy and economic growth compatible? A case for post-growth circularity [J].
Bauwens, Thomas .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 175
[6]   Circular futures: What Will They Look Like? [J].
Bauwens, Thomas ;
Hekkert, Marko ;
Kirchherr, Julian .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 175
[7]   Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance [J].
Baxt, WG ;
Waeckerle, JF ;
Berlin, JA ;
Callaham, ML .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (03) :310-317
[8]   Predatory publishers are corrupting open access [J].
Beall, Jeffrey .
NATURE, 2012, 489 (7415) :179-179
[9]  
Bell K, 2017, TRIPLEC-COMMUN CAPIT, V15, P651, DOI 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.870
[10]   Free labor for costly journals? [J].
Bergstrom, TC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (04) :183-198