Inquiring Minds Want to Improve

被引:31
作者
Falbo, Arianna [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
inquiry; norms of inquiry; aim of inquiry; interrogative attitude; epistemic improvement; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/00048402.2021.2024863
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Much of the recent work on epistemology of inquiry defends two related theses. First, inquiry into a question rationally prohibits believing an answer to that question. Second, knowledge is the aim of inquiry. I develop a series of cases which indicate that inquiry is not as narrow as these views suggest. These cases can be accommodated if we take a broader approach and understand inquiry as aiming at epistemic improvement, described more generally. This approach captures a wider range of inquiring phenomena because it accounts for forms of epistemic improvement that fall short of, or go beyond, coming to know the answer to a question.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 312
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   In Defense of Veritistic Value Monism [J].
Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer .
PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2013, 94 (01) :19-40
[2]  
AnderBois S., 2019, QUESTIONS DISCOURSE, P118, DOI DOI 10.1163/9789004378308_004
[3]   Wondering about what you know [J].
Archer, Avery .
ANALYSIS, 2018, 78 (04) :596-604
[4]   Philosophy Without Belief [J].
Barnett, Zach .
MIND, 2019, 128 (509) :109-138
[5]   Subject-sensitive invariantism and the knowledge norm for practical reasoning [J].
Brown, Jessica .
NOUS, 2008, 42 (02) :167-189
[6]   Basic questions [J].
Carruthers, Peter .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2018, 33 (02) :130-147
[7]   Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy [J].
Christensen, David .
PHILOSOPHY COMPASS, 2009, 4 (05) :756-767
[8]   CONTEXTUALISM AND KNOWLEDGE ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
DEROSE, K .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (04) :913-929
[9]  
Falbo A., ANALYSIS-UK
[10]   Rational endorsement [J].
Fleisher, Will .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2018, 175 (10) :2649-2675