Dynamic Pupillary Response in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with and without Optic Neuritis

被引:2
作者
Gil-Casas, Amparo [1 ]
Pinero, David P. [2 ]
Molina-Martin, Ainhoa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fdn Lluis Alcanyis, Optometr Clin, Valencia 46020, Spain
[2] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Grp Opt & Visual Percept GOPV, Alicante 03690, Spain
关键词
multiple sclerosis; optic neuritis; pupillometry; dynamic pupillary response; AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION; PRESENTING SIGN; PREVALENCE; LIGHT;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines11123332
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects the central nervous system which produces abnormalities in visual function, as disturbed pupillary responses, even after an episode of optic neuritis (ON). The aim was to assess different parameters of the pupillary response in MS subjects with and without ON. Therefore, 24 eyes of healthy age-matched subjects were included, 22 eyes of subjects with MS (MS group), and 13 subjects with MS with previous ON (MSON group). Pupillary parameters (ratio pupil max/min; latency; velocity and duration; contraction and dilation; and amplitude of contraction) were recorded with the MYAH topographer. Statistical analysis was performed by IBM SPSS Statistics, and parametrical or non-parametrical tests were used according to the normality of the data. MS patients did not significantly differ from healthy patients in any of the parameters analyzed (p > 0.05). Only patients with previous ON were different from healthy patients in the amplitude (40.71 +/- 6.73% vs. 45.22 +/- 3.29%, respectively) and latency of contraction (0.35 +/- 0.13 s vs. 0.26 +/- 0.05 s, respectively). The time to recover 75% of the initial diameter was abnormal in 9% of the MS subjects and 12% of MSON subjects. Based on the results of this study, the contraction process, especially latency and amplitude, was found to be affected in subjects with MS and previous ON. The degree of disability and the relation of the decrease in pupil response with other indicators of MS disease should be further investigated considering other comorbidities such as ON in the affection.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The ipRGC-Driven Pupil Response with Light Exposure, Refractive Error, and Sleep [J].
Abbott, Kaleb S. ;
Queener, Hope M. ;
Ostrin, Lisa A. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2018, 95 (04) :323-331
[2]   Autonomic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis [J].
Adamec, Ivan ;
Habek, Mario .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 115 :S73-S78
[3]   Pupillary response to sparse multifocal stimuli in multiple sclerosis patients [J].
Ali, E. N. ;
Maddess, T. ;
James, A. C. ;
Voicu, C. ;
Lueck, C. J. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (07) :854-861
[4]   Morphology and Mosaics of Melanopsin-Expressing Retinal Ganglion Cell Types in Mice [J].
Berson, David M. ;
Castrucci, Ana Maria ;
Provencio, Ignacio .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2010, 518 (13) :2405-2422
[5]   Abnormal Dynamic Pupillometry Relates to Neurologic Disability and Retinal Axonal Loss in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [J].
Bitirgen, Gulfidan ;
Akpinar, Zehra ;
Turk, Huseyin B. ;
Malik, Rayaz A. .
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (04)
[6]   Objective characterization of the relative afferent pupillary defect in MS [J].
Blazek, Paul ;
Davis, Scott L. ;
Greenberg, Benjamin M. ;
Conger, Amy ;
Conger, Darrel ;
Vernino, Steven ;
Beh, Shin ;
Stuve, Olaf ;
Saidha, Shiv ;
Ratchford, John N. ;
Green, Ari ;
Calabresi, Peter A. ;
Balcer, Laura J. ;
Frohman, Teresa C. ;
Frohman, Elliot M. .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 323 (1-2) :193-200
[7]  
Chen Jeff W, 2011, Surg Neurol Int, V2, P82, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.82248
[8]   Light-Induced Pupillary Responses in Alzheimer's Disease [J].
Chougule, Pratik S. ;
Najjar, Raymond P. ;
Finkelstein, Maxwell T. ;
Kandiah, Nagaendran ;
Milea, Dan .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
[9]  
COX TA, 1989, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V24, P207
[10]   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ROBERTSON,ARGYLL PUPIL IN CLINICAL MEDICINE [J].
DACSO, CC ;
BORTZ, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 86 (02) :199-202