Shall we dance? How systemic intermediaries coordinate interaction within local sustainability initiatives over time

被引:5
作者
Kutter, Linda [1 ,4 ]
Wolf, Patricia [2 ]
Rothbarth, Catherine Sudbrack [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Organizing & Learning, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Integrat Innovat Management, Dept Business & Management, Odense, Denmark
[3] Lucerne Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Dept Management, Luzern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Organizing & Learning, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
civic participation; innovation journey; sustainability innovation; sustainability transitions; systemic intermediaries; STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; ENERGY; ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATIONS; COMMUNITY; TYPOLOGY; CONTEXT; SECTOR; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12544
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Local sustainability transition projects are often coordinated by systemic intermediaries. In this context, previous research identified an extensive list of systemic intermediary roles and functions in the acceleration phase of these initiatives. However, little is known about the interplay between systemic intermediary activities and emerging collaboration patterns over time. This paper analyses the innovation journeys of six case studies to explore interaction dynamics and collaboration activities that emerge between systemic intermediaries, niche and regime actors over the course of time. Based on this, it develops a conceptual framework that visualizes design patterns that underlie a certain choreography of the systemic intermediaries and complements earlier research with in-depth insights into temporal aspects of multiple-actor mobilization and coordination processes in sustainability transition initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 356
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[71]  
van Lente H., 2003, International Journal of Innovation Management, V7, P247, DOI [10.1142/S1363919603000817, DOI 10.1142/S1363919603000817]
[72]  
Wanner M., 2018, PLANN REV, V54, P94, DOI [10.1080/02513625.2018.1487651, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2018.1487651]
[73]   Measuring sustainability: An evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments [J].
Williams, Stephen ;
Robinson, John .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 103 :58-66
[74]   Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives [J].
Wittmayer, Julia M. ;
Avelino, Flor ;
van Steenbergen, Frank ;
Loorbach, Derk .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2017, 24 :45-56
[75]  
Witzel A., 2000, Soc. Res, V1, P22, DOI [10.17169/fqs-1.1.1132, DOI 10.17169/FQS-1.1.1132]
[76]  
Wolf P., 2014, J PEER PRODUCTION, V5, P1
[77]   Non-governmental organisations and universities as transition intermediaries in sustainability transformations building on grassroots initiatives [J].
Wolf, Patricia ;
Harboe, Julie ;
Sudbrack Rothbarth, Catherine ;
Gaudenz, Urs ;
Arsan, Leyla ;
Obrist, Chris ;
van Leeuwen, Manon .
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (03) :596-618
[78]   Grassroots movements and the entrepreneurial city: The case of Neubad [J].
Wolf, Patricia ;
Amstutz, Sibylla ;
Schuchert, Christian Lars ;
Minder, Bettina ;
Willener, Alex .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2018, 19 (02) :100-112
[79]  
Yin R. K., 2002, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.33524/CJAR.V14I1.73