共 50 条
Outcomes of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depressive symptoms with versus without comorbid personality disorders/traits: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:5
|作者:
Ferrea, Stefano
[1
]
Petrides, Georgios
[2
,3
,4
]
Ehrt-Schafer, Yamina
[1
]
Angst, Jules
[1
]
Seifritz, Erich
[1
]
Olbrich, Sebastian
[1
]
Schoretsanitis, Georgios
[1
,2
,3
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Zurich, Hosp Psychiat, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Northwell Hlth, Psychiat Res, Zucker Hillside Hosp, Glen Oaks, NY USA
[3] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Hempstead, NY USA
[4] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Manhasset, NY USA
[5] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Behav Hlth Pavil, 7559 263rd St, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 USA
关键词:
ECT;
electroconvulsive therapy;
major depressive disorders;
mood disorders;
personality disorders;
personality traits;
POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER;
MAJOR DEPRESSION;
ELECTRODE PLACEMENT;
ECT;
SUICIDE;
EFFICACY;
CLUSTER;
MEMORY;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1111/acps.13631
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
Aims: To assess electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) outcomes in patients affected by depressive symptoms with versus without additional comorbid personality disorders/traits.Methods: We identified observational studies investigating ECT clinical outcomes in patients affected by depressive symptoms with versus without comorbid personality disorders/traits in Embase/Medline in 11/2022. Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023390833). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Our primary outcomes were ECT response and remission rates. Meta-regression analyses included effects of in/outpatient percentages, age, number of ECT sessions, and electrode placement; subgroup analyses included the assessment methods for personality disorders/traits. We performed sensitivity analyses after excluding poor-quality studies.Results: A total of 20 studies (n = 11,390) were included in our analysis. Patients with comorbid personality disorders/traits had lower remission rates (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.58, p < 0.001) with substantial heterogeneity (I-2 = 93.0%) as well as lower response rates (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.24, 0.51, n = 5129, p < 0.001) with substantial heterogeneity (I-2 = 93.0%) compared with patients without comorbid personality disorders/traits. Relapse rates were higher in patients with versus without comorbid personality disorders/traits (OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.40, 7.45, k = 4, n = 239, p = 0.006) with moderate heterogeneity (I-2 = 75.0%) and post-ECT memory impairment was more frequent in patients with versus without comorbid personality disorders/traits (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.46, k = 4, n = 471, p < 0.001) with minimal heterogeneity (I-2 = 0.0%). Dropout rates were higher in patients with versus without comorbid personality disorders/traits (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.13, 2.21, k = 3, n = 6145, p = 0.008).Conclusions: Patients with comorbid personality disorders/traits treated with ECT are reported to have lower response and remission rates and higher rates of side effects and relapse rates compared with patients without personality disorders/traits.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 32
页数:15
相关论文