Institutional dynamics and corporate innovation: A pathway to sustainable development

被引:3
作者
Akbar, Ahsan [1 ]
Usman, Muhammad [2 ]
Lin, Teng [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou City Univ Technol, Int Business Sch, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Educ, UE Business Sch, Div Management & Adm Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Guangzhou City Univ Technol, Int Business Sch, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
关键词
corporate innovation; institutional effectiveness; sustainable development; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; MANAGERIAL ABILITY; NATIONAL SYSTEMS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; FIRM; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/sd.2790
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Modern corporate success is primarily reliant on a perfect balance of institutional effectiveness, innovation, and sustainability. Therefore, the primary goal of this research is to evaluate the impact of institutional frameworks on corporate innovation in developing countries. To achieve the said objective, we use firm and country data from multiple sources, and the final dataset consists of 24,166 observations from 41 developing countries during 2014-2018. For the analysis, we employ ordered probit and instrumental variable ordered probit regression models. According to the results, the success of corporate innovation in developing countries hinges on the strength of legal, financial, administrative, political, and religious institutions. Moreover, such associations stand out more clearly in nations with strong and stable institutional frameworks. The regression results show that innovative enterprises are more prevalent in strong institutional environments compared to those in poor institutional environments. These results also indicate that a strong rule of law, protection of property rights, easy access to financing, developed financial markets, an ethical environment, control of corruption, a stable political system, a democratic government, religious diversity, and freedom all contribute to corporate innovation. Moreover, institutional efficiency and corporate viability fuel the engine of corporate innovation, encouraging enterprises to create game-changing products and services. These results contribute to the field of innovation management by considering institutional settings for sustainable development. The results have practical applications for building robust institutions and a creative culture.
引用
收藏
页码:2474 / 2488
页数:15
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Co-innovation behavior and sustainable innovation in competitive environments [J].
Adomako, Samuel ;
Nguyen, Nguyen Phong .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (03) :1735-1747
[2]   THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION [J].
AGHION, P ;
TIROLE, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :1185-1209
[3]   Resource-based and institution-based approaches to biotechnology industry development in Malaysia [J].
Ahn, Mark J. ;
York, Anne S. .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 28 (02) :257-275
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Handbook of Economic Growth
[5]   Exploring the potential of institutional quality in determining technological innovation [J].
Arshed, Noman ;
Hanif, Nadia ;
Aziz, Osama ;
Croteau, Martin .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
[6]   Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition [J].
Ayyagari, Meghana ;
Demirguec-Kunt, Asli ;
Maksimovic, Vojislav .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (06) :1545-1580
[7]   Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach [J].
Barasa, Laura ;
Knoben, Joris ;
Vermeulen, Patrick ;
Kimuyu, Peter ;
Kinyanjui, Bethuel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (01) :280-291
[8]   Industry growth and capital allocation: does having a market- or bank-based system matter? [J].
Beck, T ;
Levine, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 64 (02) :147-180
[9]  
Beck Thorsten., 2002, Financial and Legal Constraints to Firm Growth- Does size matter?
[10]   The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems [J].
Bleda, Mercedes ;
del Rio, Pablo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (05) :1039-1052