The role of green innovation in achieving environmental sustainability in European Union countries: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis

被引:56
|
作者
Aydin, Mucahit [1 ]
Degirmenci, Tunahan [2 ]
Gurdal, Temel [2 ]
Yavuz, Hakan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Polit Sci, Dept Econometr, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan Sakarya, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Polit Sci, Dept Finance, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
Green innovation; Sustainable environment; Renewable energy; R&D investments; EKC hypothesis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; OECD COUNTRIES; CAUSALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of renewable energy consumption, energy R&D investments, and green patents on the ecological footprint in European Union countries with the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis from 1990 to 2018. For this purpose, second-generation panel methods were used in the study. According to the results, the EKC hypothesis is valid only in Finland. On the other hand, renewable energy consumption reduces the ecological footprint in Austria and the Netherlands while it increases in Germany and Italy. Green patent reduces the ecological footprint in Italy while it increases in Finland, Germany, and the Netherlands, and energy R&D investments increase the ecological footprint in Austria, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands. The causality test results show unidirectional causality from renewable energy consumption, energy R&D investments, and green patents to ecological footprint. Overall, policymakers should support the green innovation process for a sustainable environment. (c) 2023 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 116
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Achieving ecological sustainability in European Union: The role of fiscal decentralization and green innovation
    Satrovic, Elma
    Zafar, Muhammad Wasif
    Suntraruk, Phassawan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 445
  • [32] Testing the transport energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the EU27 countries
    Pablo-Romero, M. P.
    Cruz, L.
    Barata, E.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 62 : 257 - 269
  • [33] Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey
    Dinda, S
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (04) : 431 - 455
  • [34] The demand for environmental quality and the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis
    Khanna, N
    Plassmann, F
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 51 (3-4) : 225 - 236
  • [35] Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for transportation modes in European countries
    Pata, Ugur Korkut
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Eryilmaz, Serkan
    Zeren, Feyyaz
    Gencer, Yasin Galip
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 122
  • [36] Testing the moderating role of trade openness on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a novel approach
    Sharif, Taimur
    Uddin, Mirza Md Moyen
    Alexiou, Constantinos
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 345 (2) : 597 - 635
  • [37] Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries
    Ben Jebli, Mehdi
    Ben Youssef, Slim
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 : 824 - 831
  • [38] The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under Norden "Green Deal" and Action Plans in Nordic European Countries
    Tchapchet-Tchouto, Jules-Eric
    Duthil, Gerard
    Tchouapi, Rosy Pascale Meyet
    Kelly, Arsene Mouongue
    Ketu, Isaac
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (4) : 16969 - 17002
  • [39] The Role of Fiscal Policy in G20 Countries in the Context of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis
    Mar'I, Muhammad
    Seraj, Mehdi
    Tursoy, Turgut
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [40] Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis on land use: The case of Romania
    Pontarollo, Nicola
    Serpieri, Carolina
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 97