Challenges and opportunity in mobility among older adults - key determinant identification

被引:26
作者
Maresova, Petra [1 ]
Krejcar, Ondrej [1 ,2 ]
Maskuriy, Raihan [3 ]
Abu Bakar, Nor Azlina [3 ]
Selamat, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Truhlarova, Zuzana [4 ]
Horak, Jiri [5 ]
Joukl, Miroslav [6 ]
Vitkova, Lucie [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Informat & Management, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Japan Int Inst Technol, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
[4] Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Educ, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
[5] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Min & Geol, 17 Listopadu 2172-15, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Hradec Kralove, Philosoph Fac, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
关键词
Mobility; Determinants; Older adults; Financial aspects; Technological solutions; LIFE-SPACE MOBILITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH; PEOPLE; NEIGHBORHOOD; ACCESSIBILITY; ASSOCIATION; HOME;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-04106-7
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundAttention is focused on the health and physical fitness of older adults due to their increasing age. Maintaining physical abilities, including safe walking and movement, significantly contributes to the perception of health in old age. One of the early signs of declining fitness in older adults is limited mobility. Approximately one third of 70-year-olds and most 80-year-olds report restrictions on mobility in their apartments and immediate surroundings. Restriction or loss of mobility is a complex multifactorial process, which makes older adults prone to falls, injuries, and hospitalizations and worsens their quality of life while increasing overall mortality.ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to identify the factors that have had a significant impact on mobility in recent years and currently, and to identify gaps in our understanding of these factors. The study aims to highlight areas where further research is needed and where new and effective solutions are required.MethodsThe PRISMA methodology was used to conduct a scoping review in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Papers published from 2007 to 2021 were searched in November 2021. Of these, 52 papers were selected from the initial 788 outputs for the final analysis.ResultsThe final selected papers were analyzed, and the key determinants were found to be environmental, physical, cognitive, and psychosocial, which confirms the findings of previous studies. One new determinant is technological. New and effective solutions lie in understanding the interactions between different determinants of mobility, addressing environmental factors, and exploring opportunities in the context of emerging technologies, such as the integration of smart home technologies, design of accessible and age-friendly public spaces, development of policies and regulations, and exploration of innovative financing models to support the integration of assistive technologies into the lives of seniors.ConclusionFor an effective and comprehensive solution to support senior mobility, the determinants cannot be solved separately. Physical, cognitive, psychosocial, and technological determinants can often be perceived as the cause/motivation for mobility. Further research on these determinants can help to arrive at solutions for environmental determinants, which, in turn, will help improve mobility. Future studies should investigate financial aspects, especially since many technological solutions are expensive and not commonly available, which limits their use.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Neighbourhood Supports for Active Ageing in Urban India
    Adlakha, Deepti
    Krishna, Murali
    Woolrych, Ryan
    Ellis, Geraint
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND DEVELOPING SOCIETIES, 2020, 32 (02) : 254 - 277
  • [2] Life-Space Mobility in Mexican Americans Aged 75 and Older
    Al Snih, Soham
    Peek, Kristen M.
    Sawyer, Patricia
    Markides, Kyriakos S.
    Allman, Richard M.
    Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (03) : 532 - 537
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, IND AUSTR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, Health, Nutrition and Population Internet
  • [5] More gray hair - but for whom? Scenario-based simulations of elderly activity travel patterns in 2020
    Arentze, Theo
    Timmermans, Harry
    Jorritsma, Peter
    Kalter, Marie-Jose Olde
    Schoemakers, Arnout
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2008, 35 (05) : 613 - 627
  • [6] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [7] Correlates of life space in a volunteer cohort of older adults
    Barnes, Lisa L.
    Wilson, Robert S.
    Bienias, Julia L.
    de Leon, Carlos F. Mendes
    Kim, Hye-Jin Nicole
    Buchman, Aron S.
    Bennett, David A.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2007, 33 (01) : 77 - 93
  • [8] A GPS-Based Framework for Understanding Outdoor Mobility Patterns of Older Adults with Dementia: An Exploratory Study
    Bayat, Sayeh
    Naglie, Gary
    Rapoport, Mark J.
    Stasiulis, Elaine
    Widener, Michael J.
    Mihailidis, Alex
    [J]. GERONTOLOGY, 2022, 68 (01) : 106 - 120
  • [9] Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area
    Benenson, Itzhak
    Martens, Karel
    Rofe, Yodan
    Kwartler, Ariela
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 47 (03) : 499 - 515
  • [10] Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Haunschild, Robin
    Hug, Sven E.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 114 (02) : 427 - 437