Efficacy and safety analysis of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients

被引:4
|
作者
Lu, Yongkai [1 ]
Hui, Beina [1 ]
Yang, Di [2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Li, Binglin [3 ]
Zhou, Luping [1 ]
Xu, Lei [1 ]
Tang, Fengwen [1 ]
Wang, Wei [4 ]
Chen, Ruijuan [3 ]
Zhao, Dongli [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, 277 Yanta West Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol,Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Xian Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp, Xian 710003, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Air Force Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xian 710003, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Hypofractionated radiotherapy; Conventional fractionated radiotherapy; Meta-analysis; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BIG; 3-07/TROG; 07.01; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; UK STANDARDIZATION; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; CONSERVING SURGERY; REPORTED OUTCOMES; ACUTE TOXICITY; SKIN TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-11918-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives In this meta-analysis, we conducted a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in individuals who had undergone surgery for breast cancer. Methods This study involved a systematic and independent review of relevant research articles published in reputable databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two investigators conducted the review, which included studies published up to January 3, 2023. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated and data were extracted using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The analysis comprised 35 studies and encompassed a collective sample of 18,246 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. We did not find a statistically significant disparity in efficacy between conventional fractionated (CF) radiotherapy and hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy regarding local recurrence (LR; OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30), disease-free survival (DFS; OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42, P = 0.03), and overall survival (OS; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.26, P = 0.28). Concerning safety, there was no significant difference between the HF and CF regimens in terms of breast pain, breast atrophy, lymphedema, pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, telangiectasia, and cardiotoxicity. However, the HF regimen resulted in lower skin toxicity (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55, P < 0.01) and improved patient fatigue outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.88, P < 0.01). Conclusions Although there is no substantial difference in LR, DFS, OS, or many other side effects between the HF and CF regimens, the HF regimen reduces skin toxicity and relieves patient fatigue. If these two issues need to be addressed in clinical situations, the HF regimen may be a superior alternative to conventional radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of hypofractionated and normofractionated radiotherapy in a triple-negative breast cancer model
    Grosche, Sinja
    Bogdanova, Natalia, V
    Ramachandran, Dhanya
    Luedeking, Marcus
    Stemwedel, Katharina
    Christiansen, Hans
    Henkenberens, Christoph
    Merten, Roland
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [22] Postoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Tramacere, Francesco
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    Pignatelli, Antonietta
    Bracci, Stefano
    Vinella, Marcello
    Portaluri, Maurizio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (05) : 2951 - 2956
  • [23] The efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent anti-HER-2 therapy following breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
    Dreyfuss, Alexandra D.
    Barsky, Andrew R.
    Taunk, Neil K.
    Clark, Amy S.
    Freedman, Gary M.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06) : 1097 - 1103
  • [24] Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with high-risk breast cancer: a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial
    Wang, Shu-Lian
    Fang, Hui
    Song, Yong-Wen
    Wang, Wei-Hu
    Hu, Chen
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Jin, Jing
    Liu, Xin-Fan
    Yu, Zi-Hao
    Ren, Hua
    Li, Ning
    Lu, Ning-Ning
    Tang, Yu
    Tang, Yuan
    Qi, Shu-Nan
    Sun, Guang-Yi
    Peng, Ran
    Li, Shuai
    Chen, Bo
    Yang, Yong
    Li, Ye-Xiong
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [25] Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy in breast conservation for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Valle, Luca F.
    Agarwal, Surbhi
    Bickel, Kathleen E.
    Herchek, Haley A.
    Nalepinski, David C.
    Kapadia, Nirav S.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 162 (03) : 409 - 417
  • [26] Radiotherapy-Induced Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients
    Kowalczyk, Lidia
    Deutschmann, Christine
    Crevenna, Richard
    Konrad, Stefan
    Singer, Christian F.
    Farr, Alex
    BREAST CARE, 2021, 16 (03) : 236 - 242
  • [27] Racial Disparities in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
    Housri, Nadine
    Khan, Atif J.
    Taunk, Neil
    Goyal, Sharad
    Nelson, Carl J.
    Ferro, Adam
    Haffty, Bruce G.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (04) : 387 - 394
  • [28] Hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer
    Yarnold, John
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S28 - S29
  • [29] An observational study comparing the dosimetry and clinical effects of conventional versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients of early breast cancer
    Chhatui, Bappaditya
    Roy, Niladri
    Chakrabarty, Shinjini
    Choudhury, Alakananda
    Ravy, Aishwarya
    Mazumder, Justice
    Majhi, Dharma
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 21 (01) : 118 - 123
  • [30] Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy and Boost in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Taunk, Neil K.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 12 (04) : 296 - 304