Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain

被引:1
作者
Wong, Jessica J. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
De Groote, Wouter [5 ]
Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka [6 ,7 ]
Garin, Olatz [8 ,9 ]
Ferrer, Montse [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Acuna, angels Pont [8 ,9 ]
Cote, Pierre [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Tech Univ, Inst Disabil & Rehabil Res, Fac Hlth Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
[2] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Grad Studies, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[3] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Dept Res & Innovat, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[5] Dept Noncommunicable Dis, Rehabil Programme, Sensory Funct Disabil & Rehabil Unit, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Rzeszow, Inst Hlth Sci, Coll Med Sci, Rejtana St 16C, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[7] Rzeszow Univ, Ctr Innovat Res Med & Nat Sci, Lab Geronto Prophylaxis, Warzywna St 1A, PL-35310 Rzeszow, Poland
[8] IMIM Hosp Mar, Hlth Serv Res Unit, C Dr Aiguader,88, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[9] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Ave Monforte Lemos 3-5, Pabellon 11 Planta 0, Madrid 28029, Spain
[10] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ronda Univ,21, Barcelona 08007, Spain
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Low back pain; Minimal important difference; Functioning; Disability; Measurement; SF-36; RESPONSIVENESS; VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-023-00521-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 12-item survey (WHODAS-12) is a questionnaire developed by the WHO to measure functioning across health conditions, cultures, and settings. WHODAS-12 consists of a subset of the 36 items of WHODAS-2.0 36-item questionnaire. Little is known about the minimal important difference (MID) of WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain (LBP), which would be useful to determine whether rehabilitation improves functioning to an extent that is meaningful for people experiencing the condition. Our objective was to estimate an anchor-based MID for WHODAS-12 questionnaire in persons with chronic LBP.MethodsWe analyzed data from two cohort studies (identified in our previous systematic review) conducted in Europe that measured functioning using the WHODAS-36 in adults with chronic LBP. Eligible participants were adults with chronic LBP with scores on another measure as an anchor to indicate participants with small but important changes in functioning over time [Short-form-36 Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at baseline and follow-up (study 1: 3-months post-treatment; study 2: 1-month post-discharge from hospital). WHODAS-12 scores were constructed as sums of the 12 items (scored 0-4), with possible scores ranging from 0 to 48. We calculated the mean WHODAS-12 score in participants who achieved a small but meaningful improvement on SF36-PF or ODI at follow-up. A meaningful improvement was an MID of 4-16 on ODI or 5-16 on SF36-PF.ResultsOf 70 eligible participants in study 1 (mean age = 54.1 years, SD = 14.7; 69% female), 18 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on SF-36 PF. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 3.22/48 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64). Of 89 eligible participants in study 2 (mean age = 65.5 years, SD = 11.5; 61% female), 50 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on ODI. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 5.99/48 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79).ConclusionsUsing an anchor-based approach, the MID of WHODAS-12 is estimated at -3.22 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64) or -5.99 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79) in adults with chronic LBP. These MID values inform the utility of WHODAS-12 in measuring functioning to determine whether rehabilitation or other health services achieve a minimal difference that is meaningful to patients with chronic LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Characterization of Disability in Canadians with Mental Disorders Using an Abbreviated Version of a DSM-5 Emerging Measure: The 12-Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 [J].
Sjonnesen, Kirsten ;
Bulloch, Andrew G. M. ;
Williams, Jeanne ;
Lavorato, Dina ;
Patten, Scott B. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2016, 61 (04) :227-235
[42]   THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (WHODAS 2.0) AND THE WHO MINIMAL GENERIC SET OF DOMAINS OF FUNCTIONING AND HEALTH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTS IN SUBACUTE STROKE [J].
Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka ;
Hurme, Saija ;
Laimi, Katri .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (09) :675-682
[43]   Validity of the self-rated 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a measure of functioning in Swedish psychiatric outpatients [J].
Ramklint, Mia ;
Soderberg, Per ;
Tungstrom, Stefan ;
Nordenskjold, Axel ;
Hermansson, Liselotte .
NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 77 (03) :276-281
[44]   Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity [J].
Silveira, Carla ;
Souza, Renato T. ;
Costa, Maria L. ;
Parpinelli, Mary A. ;
Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. ;
Ferreira, Elton C. ;
Mayrink, Jussara ;
Guida, Jose P. ;
Sousa, Maria H. ;
Say, Lale ;
Chou, Doris ;
Filippi, Veronique ;
Barreix, Maria ;
Barbour, Kelli ;
Firoz, Tabassum ;
von Dadelszen, Peter ;
Cecatti, Jose G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 141 :39-47
[45]   Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal [J].
Risal, Ajay ;
Kunwar, Dipak ;
Karki, Eliza ;
Adhikari, Shambhu Prasad ;
Bimali, Inosha ;
Shrestha, Barsha ;
Khadka, Subekshya ;
Holen, Are .
BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (01)
[46]   The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients [J].
Higgins, Alisa M. ;
Neto, Ary Serpa ;
Bailey, Michael ;
Barrett, Jonathan ;
Bellomo, Rinaldo ;
Cooper, D. James ;
Gabbe, Belinda ;
Linke, Natalie ;
Myles, Paul S. ;
Paton, Michelle ;
Philpot, Steve ;
Shulman, Mark ;
Young, Meredith ;
Hodgson, Carol L. .
CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2021, 23 (01) :103-+
[47]   Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis [J].
Kutlay, Sehim ;
Kucukdeveci, Ayse A. ;
Elhan, Atilla H. ;
Oztuna, Derya ;
Koc, Nihal ;
Tennant, Alan .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (03) :339-346
[48]   Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis [J].
Şehim Kutlay ;
Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci ;
Atilla H. Elhan ;
Derya Öztuna ;
Nihal Koç ;
Alan Tennant .
Rheumatology International, 2011, 31 :339-346
[49]   Pre-rehabilitation scores of functioning measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in persons with nonspecific low back pain: a scoping review [J].
Wong, Jessica J. ;
DeSouza, Astrid ;
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah ;
De Groote, Wouter ;
Varmazyar, Hamid ;
Mior, Silvano A. ;
Stern, Paula J. ;
Southerst, Danielle ;
Alexopulos, Stephanie ;
Belchos, Melissa ;
Lemeunier, Nadege ;
Nordin, Margareta C. ;
Murnaghan, Kent ;
Cieza, Alarcos ;
Cote, Pierre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (04) :302-310
[50]   Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea [J].
de Oliveira, Ana Cecilia Silva ;
Zacarias, Laila Candida ;
de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha ;
Bezerra, Joao Paulo da Silva ;
Viana-Junior, Antonio Brazil ;
Sobreira-Neto, Manoel Alves ;
Leite, Camila Ferreira .
HEART & LUNG, 2024, 67 :183-190