Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain

被引:2
作者
Wong, Jessica J. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
De Groote, Wouter [5 ]
Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka [6 ,7 ]
Garin, Olatz [8 ,9 ]
Ferrer, Montse [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Acuna, angels Pont [8 ,9 ]
Cote, Pierre [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Tech Univ, Inst Disabil & Rehabil Res, Fac Hlth Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
[2] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Grad Studies, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[3] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Dept Res & Innovat, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[5] Dept Noncommunicable Dis, Rehabil Programme, Sensory Funct Disabil & Rehabil Unit, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Rzeszow, Inst Hlth Sci, Coll Med Sci, Rejtana St 16C, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[7] Rzeszow Univ, Ctr Innovat Res Med & Nat Sci, Lab Geronto Prophylaxis, Warzywna St 1A, PL-35310 Rzeszow, Poland
[8] IMIM Hosp Mar, Hlth Serv Res Unit, C Dr Aiguader,88, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[9] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Ave Monforte Lemos 3-5, Pabellon 11 Planta 0, Madrid 28029, Spain
[10] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ronda Univ,21, Barcelona 08007, Spain
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Low back pain; Minimal important difference; Functioning; Disability; Measurement; SF-36; RESPONSIVENESS; VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-023-00521-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 12-item survey (WHODAS-12) is a questionnaire developed by the WHO to measure functioning across health conditions, cultures, and settings. WHODAS-12 consists of a subset of the 36 items of WHODAS-2.0 36-item questionnaire. Little is known about the minimal important difference (MID) of WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain (LBP), which would be useful to determine whether rehabilitation improves functioning to an extent that is meaningful for people experiencing the condition. Our objective was to estimate an anchor-based MID for WHODAS-12 questionnaire in persons with chronic LBP.MethodsWe analyzed data from two cohort studies (identified in our previous systematic review) conducted in Europe that measured functioning using the WHODAS-36 in adults with chronic LBP. Eligible participants were adults with chronic LBP with scores on another measure as an anchor to indicate participants with small but important changes in functioning over time [Short-form-36 Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at baseline and follow-up (study 1: 3-months post-treatment; study 2: 1-month post-discharge from hospital). WHODAS-12 scores were constructed as sums of the 12 items (scored 0-4), with possible scores ranging from 0 to 48. We calculated the mean WHODAS-12 score in participants who achieved a small but meaningful improvement on SF36-PF or ODI at follow-up. A meaningful improvement was an MID of 4-16 on ODI or 5-16 on SF36-PF.ResultsOf 70 eligible participants in study 1 (mean age = 54.1 years, SD = 14.7; 69% female), 18 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on SF-36 PF. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 3.22/48 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64). Of 89 eligible participants in study 2 (mean age = 65.5 years, SD = 11.5; 61% female), 50 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on ODI. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 5.99/48 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79).ConclusionsUsing an anchor-based approach, the MID of WHODAS-12 is estimated at -3.22 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64) or -5.99 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79) in adults with chronic LBP. These MID values inform the utility of WHODAS-12 in measuring functioning to determine whether rehabilitation or other health services achieve a minimal difference that is meaningful to patients with chronic LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Measuring Disability in Consumers of mental health services - psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Ghana [J].
Badu, Eric ;
Mitchell, Rebecca ;
O'Brien, Anthony Paul ;
Osei, Akwasi ;
Rubin, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (05) :1274-1288
[22]   Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore [J].
Abdin, Edimansyah ;
Seet, Vanessa ;
Jeyagurunathan, Anitha ;
Tan, Sing Chik ;
Mok, Yee Ming ;
Verma, Swapna ;
Lee, Eng Sing ;
Subramaniam, Mythily .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11)
[23]   Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD [J].
Zacarias, Laila Candida ;
da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer ;
Alves, Barbara Marques ;
Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza ;
Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria ;
Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano ;
Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan ;
Leite, Camila Ferreira .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) :5663-5668
[24]   Correlation between the pain numeric rating scale and the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients with musculoskeletal pain [J].
Saltychev, Mikhail ;
Barlund, Esa ;
Laimi, Katri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2018, 41 (01) :87-91
[25]   Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder [J].
Park, Shin Ho ;
Demetriou, Eleni A. ;
Pepper, Karen L. ;
Song, Yun Ju C. ;
Thomas, Emma E. ;
Hickie, Ian B. ;
Glozier, Nick ;
Guastella, Adam J. .
AUTISM RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (07) :1101-1111
[26]   Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J].
Gaskin, Cadeyrn J. ;
Lambert, Sylvie D. ;
Bowe, Steven J. ;
Orellana, Liliana .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
[27]   Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J].
Cadeyrn J. Gaskin ;
Sylvie D. Lambert ;
Steven J. Bowe ;
Liliana Orellana .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
[28]   The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review [J].
Ciamarra, Paola ;
Corbi, Graziamaria ;
Gimigliano, Francesca ;
Feola, Alessandro ;
Campobasso, Carlo Pietro .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2025, 47 (15) :3773-3780
[29]   Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review [J].
Saltychev, Mikhail ;
Katajapuu, Niina ;
Barlund, Esa ;
Laimi, Katri .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (06) :789-794
[30]   Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke [J].
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins ;
Pereira, Gabriela Santos ;
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro ;
da Silva, Paula Karina ;
Lima, Michael Goncalves ;
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo ;
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli ;
Silva, Soraia Micaela .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (13) :2169-2174